Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="enzowho" data-source="post: 2519683" data-attributes="member: 568136">Yeah, that&#039;s really low for domes.&nbsp; I know most domes like to be crossed over between 500-700 Hz.&nbsp; 250, that&#039;s absolutely insane!On topic though.&nbsp; I would choose a cone over a dome midrange.&nbsp; The dispersion patters of domes makes imaging a noteworthy challenge.&nbsp; That&#039;s not to say it can&#039;t be done, but it will be much harder then with cones.Also, I would get <a href="http://www.madisound.com/cgi-bin/index.cgi?cart_id=6782700.16854&amp;amp;pid=1005" target="_blank">these</a> instead of the Daytons.&nbsp; I have played with both tweets and like the Seas better.&nbsp; They are a larger tweeter, but sound great!While I&#039;m at it, you might want to check out <a href="http://www.zaphaudio.com/" target="_blank">Zaph&#039;s site</a>.&nbsp; There is some very good information about DIY speakers.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="enzowho, post: 2519683, member: 568136"] Yeah, that's really low for domes. I know most domes like to be crossed over between 500-700 Hz. 250, that's absolutely insane! On topic though. I would choose a cone over a dome midrange. The dispersion patters of domes makes imaging a noteworthy challenge. That's not to say it can't be done, but it will be much harder then with cones. Also, I would get [URL="http://www.madisound.com/cgi-bin/index.cgi?cart_id=6782700.16854&pid=1005"]these[/URL] instead of the Daytons. I have played with both tweets and like the Seas better. They are a larger tweeter, but sound great! While I'm at it, you might want to check out [URL="http://www.zaphaudio.com/"]Zaph's site[/URL]. There is some very good information about DIY speakers. [/QUOTE]

Verification