Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="NINaudio" data-source="post: 474884" data-attributes="member: 555296">1998 Honda Accord 2.3 4 cyl.: 23-26 mpgIt&#039;s actually kinda funny, because before the stereo I was getting about 21-23 mpg.&nbsp; So as the stereo&#039;s being done I also installed an intake and cat-back exhaust and when all is said and done I end up getting better mileage.&nbsp; I&#039;m getting a header soon, and I&#039;m interested to see if that&#039;ll help even more.&nbsp; I&#039;m thinking it should since anything that helps the engine breath better increases its volumetric efficiency.&nbsp; I guess I&#039;ll find out soon enough though.And that with a lead foot.&nbsp; I&#039;m with phoneman on this one, my commute isn&#039;t as long, only 45 miles each way, and I take either the parkway or the turnpike and 70 is slow on those roads.&nbsp; 80+ is a normal speed, and there have been days where i&#039;ve taken it well above that when I&#039;ve been running late.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="NINaudio, post: 474884, member: 555296"] 1998 Honda Accord 2.3 4 cyl.: 23-26 mpg It's actually kinda funny, because before the stereo I was getting about 21-23 mpg. So as the stereo's being done I also installed an intake and cat-back exhaust and when all is said and done I end up getting better mileage. I'm getting a header soon, and I'm interested to see if that'll help even more. I'm thinking it should since anything that helps the engine breath better increases its volumetric efficiency. I guess I'll find out soon enough though. And that with a lead foot. I'm with phoneman on this one, my commute isn't as long, only 45 miles each way, and I take either the parkway or the turnpike and 70 is slow on those roads. 80+ is a normal speed, and there have been days where i've taken it well above that when I've been running late. [/QUOTE]

Verification