Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="jsloan10" data-source="post: 975001" data-attributes="member: 560397">Look at the response lines in these two charts-RL-sealed0.75 cu ft net volume(Red curve = you&#039;re curve)<img src="http://img295.echo.cx/img295/3476/rli10sealed6qy.gif" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" />RL-ported (Green curve = desired sound)1.25 cu ft netTuned to 26 Hz20 sq. in. of Vent Area<img src="http://img295.echo.cx/img295/3083/rli10vented6hg.gif" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" />From those charts it looks like the RL-i sounds like *** in a sealed box, even with cabin gain the the output will sound limited in a sealed enclosure.the ported box however shows a reasonably straight response curve from 100 to 26hz, factor in cabin gain and that thing should wang like hell.Forget about the lotion Idea, you have the subs in the wrong box.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="jsloan10, post: 975001, member: 560397"] Look at the response lines in these two charts- RL-sealed 0.75 cu ft net volume(Red curve = you're curve) [IMG]http://img295.echo.cx/img295/3476/rli10sealed6qy.gif[/IMG] RL-ported (Green curve = desired sound) 1.25 cu ft net Tuned to 26 Hz 20 sq. in. of Vent Area [IMG]http://img295.echo.cx/img295/3083/rli10vented6hg.gif[/IMG] From those charts it looks like the RL-i sounds like *** in a sealed box, even with cabin gain the the output will sound limited in a sealed enclosure. the ported box however shows a reasonably straight response curve from 100 to 26hz, factor in cabin gain and that thing should wang like hell. Forget about the lotion Idea, you have the subs in the wrong box. [/QUOTE]

Verification