Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="sumone" data-source="post: 1830346" data-attributes="member: 551481">Kanye West does it! //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gifDon&#039;t even look into vocal removers - you&#039;re bound to run into one if you do a little searching. Vocal Removers play on the fact that most songs throw the vocals right in the middle of your head, while instruments are around your head; maybe some hi-hats on the left ear, some brass on your right ear, etc...so what they do is drop that center channel....which, in theory, leaves everything that was not panned directly center. The problem is kick drums, snares, and bass [guitar] are usually panned center too....so you lose that. Then there&#039;s tracks that don&#039;t follow &#039;the rule&#039;, if you&#039;d like to call it that.However, there are some ways (but comprising is in this same path)- Looping parts of the song where there are no words- Sometimes on oldschool tracks (mainly a lot of 60s &amp;amp; early 70s productions), the vocal track would sit all the way on one side (sometimes the other side might have the reverberation of those vocals)...so you could just make your track by only utilizing that one side that does not have the main vocals...and you&#039;d still need some looping. One track that is a good example of this is the sample used in &quot;Poppin&#039; My Collar&quot; by 3-6. The sample is by Willie Hutch, album is the OST of Motion Picture The Mack (1973), and the song is &quot;Theme of the Mack&quot;. But like the &#039;vocal removers&#039;, if you only use one side, you may be missing a lot that was on the same side as the vocals.So really there are ways to get around vocals, but never truly eliminate them, leaving only the backing track. To get an exact duplicate of a track minus the vocals, impossible if you don&#039;t have the individual tracks that comprised &quot;the mix&quot;.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="sumone, post: 1830346, member: 551481"] Kanye West does it! [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif[/IMG] Don't even look into vocal removers - you're bound to run into one if you do a little searching. Vocal Removers play on the fact that most songs throw the vocals right in the middle of your head, while instruments are around your head; maybe some hi-hats on the left ear, some brass on your right ear, etc...so what they do is drop that center channel....which, in theory, leaves everything that was not panned directly center. The problem is kick drums, snares, and bass [guitar] are usually panned center too....so you lose that. Then there's tracks that don't follow 'the rule', if you'd like to call it that. However, there are some ways (but comprising is in this same path) - Looping parts of the song where there are no words - Sometimes on oldschool tracks (mainly a lot of 60s & early 70s productions), the vocal track would sit all the way on one side (sometimes the other side might have the reverberation of those vocals)...so you could just make your track by only utilizing that one side that does not have the main vocals...and you'd still need some looping. One track that is a good example of this is the sample used in "Poppin' My Collar" by 3-6. The sample is by Willie Hutch, album is the OST of Motion Picture [I]The Mack[/I] (1973), and the song is "Theme of the Mack". But like the 'vocal removers', if you only use one side, you may be missing a lot that was on the same side as the vocals. So really there are ways to [I]get around[/I] vocals, but never truly eliminate them, leaving only the backing track. To get an [B]exact[/B] duplicate of a track minus the vocals, impossible if you don't have the individual tracks that comprised "the mix". [/QUOTE]

Verification