Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="dejo" data-source="post: 1363897" data-attributes="member: 565102">thats the problem with IASCA, its not about how it sounds. If you dont spend a crapload of money on things that dont matter to sound you cant win. I personally think that the best sounding car should win any sq comp. To me all that PR butt kissing is stupid, if the judge cant figure out why something was done then more than likely it didnt need to be done or the show has some horrible judges. I think that the useless money spending shouldnt sway a judge either way.The best sounding car should win. period.I can remember when Gary Biggs was just getting good at his trade and won an IASCA national championship, the next year they beat him down. I would guess thinking that he didnt have a good enough name for himself to compete with the people that he was beating. Now his cars seem to dominate as he has now made a name for himself. He does some nice stuff and doesnt go to far overboard and I like that.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="dejo, post: 1363897, member: 565102"] thats the problem with IASCA, its not about how it sounds. If you dont spend a crapload of money on things that dont matter to sound you cant win. I personally think that the best sounding car should win any sq comp. To me all that PR butt kissing is stupid, if the judge cant figure out why something was done then more than likely it didnt need to be done or the show has some horrible judges. I think that the useless money spending shouldnt sway a judge either way. The best sounding car should win. period. I can remember when Gary Biggs was just getting good at his trade and won an IASCA national championship, the next year they beat him down. I would guess thinking that he didnt have a good enough name for himself to compete with the people that he was beating. Now his cars seem to dominate as he has now made a name for himself. He does some nice stuff and doesnt go to far overboard and I like that. [/QUOTE]

Verification