Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="BassAddictJ" data-source="post: 3217407" data-attributes="member: 560415">if we&#039;re talking2 tc5200 18&#039;svs2 fi btl 18&#039;smy answer is in my avitar. I&#039;ve heard both subs in daily driver appilcation and both are bad *** on the spl side, but the TC takes it for sounding better IMO.&nbsp; Dont get me wrong the BTL&#039;s sound good in low tuned dd boxes, but the 5200&#039;s sounded better and require far less airspace to do the job. My 5200 18&#039;&#039; was in 3.5cubs @ 34Hz (dont recall the port area off the top of my head but it was more port area than the website recommended) and it was phenominal.in SPL application ive seen the 5200&#039;s do as amazing as well as btl&#039;s. I loved my 5200 so much so much...i miss my 18 so much....blazing cars and what not put a damper on things for me..and yes i&#039;m also unhappy with the price hike too......</blockquote>

[QUOTE="BassAddictJ, post: 3217407, member: 560415"] if we're talking 2 tc5200 18's vs 2 fi btl 18's my answer is in my avitar. I've heard both subs in daily driver appilcation and both are bad *** on the spl side, but the TC takes it for sounding better IMO. Dont get me wrong the BTL's sound good in low tuned dd boxes, but the 5200's sounded better and require far less airspace to do the job. My 5200 18'' was in 3.5cubs @ 34Hz (dont recall the port area off the top of my head but it was more port area than the website recommended) and it was phenominal. in SPL application ive seen the 5200's do as amazing as well as btl's. I loved my 5200 so much so much... i miss my 18 so much....blazing cars and what not put a damper on things for me.. and yes i'm also unhappy with the price hike too...... [/QUOTE]

Verification