Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Immacomputer" data-source="post: 4904076" data-attributes="member: 570419">A Linkwitz transform is much different than a Linkwitz-Riley crossover, if that&#039;s what you&#039;re thinking of.A Linkwitz transform basically lowers the amplitude of all frequencies above a chosen frequency but doesn&#039;t roll them off like a LP crossover will. The only problem is that you have to apply more power to get the same output above your chosen frequency.<img src="http://i34.tinypic.com/dd27bb.png" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" />Take that graph for instance. After the LT is applied, the top end looses output but the end response is flatter.After you apply more power, you should be able to get something like this as long as you have excursion room down in the area that was not affected by the LT:<img src="http://i34.tinypic.com/2j63ck6.png" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Immacomputer, post: 4904076, member: 570419"] A Linkwitz transform is much different than a Linkwitz-Riley crossover, if that's what you're thinking of. A Linkwitz transform basically lowers the amplitude of all frequencies above a chosen frequency but doesn't roll them off like a LP crossover will. The only problem is that you have to apply more power to get the same output above your chosen frequency. [IMG]http://i34.tinypic.com/dd27bb.png[/IMG] Take that graph for instance. After the LT is applied, the top end looses output but the end response is flatter. After you apply more power, you should be able to get something like this as long as you have excursion room down in the area that was not affected by the LT: [IMG]http://i34.tinypic.com/2j63ck6.png[/IMG] [/QUOTE]

Verification