Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="joshpoints" data-source="post: 472041" data-attributes="member: 546465">Bush didn&#039;t make the intelligence up he simply used the intelligence the US had, that appears may have been inaccurate.Saddam has used chemicals weapons in the past.&nbsp; Saddam murdered many.&nbsp; Saddam built a nuclear weapons plant that was taken out by Israel.&nbsp; Saddam attempted to build another plant according to a former regime member that was the head of their weapons development program.&nbsp; On record we know saddam had a particular amount of weapons and he claims he destroyed them but didn&#039;t do it in front of the UN so there is no proof of that.&nbsp; When weapons inspectors would go in he wouldn&#039;t let them into certain areas.&nbsp; Now I&#039;m not sure what other intelligence we had but it seemed to convince Bush along with Congress that Iraq was a danger.China is slowly changing on its own as the government is becoming more and more relaxed with trade.&nbsp; I agree with you in some ways on no. korea and china. I haven&#039;t heard anymore threats from No. korea so I&#039;m not sure what is going with that.&nbsp; I believe if we do plan on striking No. korea we will wait until the nuclear plant is fully capable and is producing nuclear weapons and then we&#039;ll take it out with a missile. The second option is we use China to influence no. korea.&nbsp; China afterall is a friend in trade.&nbsp; Now in my opinion china is a super power.&nbsp; If we tried to use force with china the fear is they&#039;d send a nuclear weapon to the US.&nbsp; Now I will admit I know very little about what goes on in china and if anyone could give me a link that would be great.&nbsp; At this point the best way to help china is through the influence of trade.&nbsp; I do believe down the road china will have a chance to take over the world but that will occur once I&#039;m dead and gone.&nbsp; I won&#039;t get into this because most will think my thoughts are too extreme on the issue.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="joshpoints, post: 472041, member: 546465"] Bush didn't make the intelligence up he simply used the intelligence the US had, that appears may have been inaccurate. Saddam has used chemicals weapons in the past. Saddam murdered many. Saddam built a nuclear weapons plant that was taken out by Israel. Saddam attempted to build another plant according to a former regime member that was the head of their weapons development program. On record we know saddam had a particular amount of weapons and he claims he destroyed them but didn't do it in front of the UN so there is no proof of that. When weapons inspectors would go in he wouldn't let them into certain areas. Now I'm not sure what other intelligence we had but it seemed to convince Bush along with Congress that Iraq was a danger. China is slowly changing on its own as the government is becoming more and more relaxed with trade. I agree with you in some ways on no. korea and china. I haven't heard anymore threats from No. korea so I'm not sure what is going with that. I believe if we do plan on striking No. korea we will wait until the nuclear plant is fully capable and is producing nuclear weapons and then we'll take it out with a missile. The second option is we use China to influence no. korea. China afterall is a friend in trade. Now in my opinion china is a super power. If we tried to use force with china the fear is they'd send a nuclear weapon to the US. Now I will admit I know very little about what goes on in china and if anyone could give me a link that would be great. At this point the best way to help china is through the influence of trade. I do believe down the road china will have a chance to take over the world but that will occur once I'm dead and gone. I won't get into this because most will think my thoughts are too extreme on the issue. [/QUOTE]

Verification