Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
Excursion
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="audioholic" data-source="post: 972042" data-attributes="member: 549629"><p>As to if excursion affects "SQ", yes it does. Two subs, one with greater excursion than the other, the one woth more excursion will be working proportionally less to acheive the same output. In other words, two subs moving 10mm (which will be equal output.. assuming same cone displacement here for simplicity), one has 20mm xmax, the other has 30mm xmax, the one with 20mm xmax will be working at 50% of its maximum while the 30mm sub will only be working at 30% capacity. 30% versus 50% equals less stress on the sub obviously. This does not mean all subs with greater excursion will inherantly be cleaner, as many other factors are involved (motor topology, etc), but its certainly an advantage.</p><p></p><p>Also, more excursion means more displacement potential which generally equals more low end output, as it takes more and more displacement for lower and lower notes to play at the same output. Some would consider this better "SQ" in the subjective sense.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="audioholic, post: 972042, member: 549629"] As to if excursion affects "SQ", yes it does. Two subs, one with greater excursion than the other, the one woth more excursion will be working proportionally less to acheive the same output. In other words, two subs moving 10mm (which will be equal output.. assuming same cone displacement here for simplicity), one has 20mm xmax, the other has 30mm xmax, the one with 20mm xmax will be working at 50% of its maximum while the 30mm sub will only be working at 30% capacity. 30% versus 50% equals less stress on the sub obviously. This does not mean all subs with greater excursion will inherantly be cleaner, as many other factors are involved (motor topology, etc), but its certainly an advantage. Also, more excursion means more displacement potential which generally equals more low end output, as it takes more and more displacement for lower and lower notes to play at the same output. Some would consider this better "SQ" in the subjective sense. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
Excursion
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list