Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="randomco" data-source="post: 709477" data-attributes="member: 551938">fraksured, i dont know if you have heard of him, but there is a doctor by the name of dr. kent hovind who will debate any professor, at any time, and most of the time, he wins. he is creation scientist.here are some examples of how MACRO evolution, and the theory of evolution is impossiblefirst of all the evolution side of things say that the earth is approx 4.6 billion years old, while the creationist say that it cant be more than 10,000 years old.ok 1. the moon has been slowly leaving the earth, about 3 or so feet per year, working backward the moon would have been 3 feet closer last year and so on and so on. with creation thats fine, cause if the earth is only 10g&#039;s old then it would still put the moon in a reasonable distance away.&nbsp; with evolutionist the moon would be touching the earths surface as little as 1 million years ago, now if the earth is 4.6 billion years old, how is this possible?2.&nbsp; the sun has been shrinking over the years,&nbsp; at the rate of its shrinking right now, reversing it again, as little as a couple million years ago, the sun would be so big it would burn up everything, including life.&nbsp; again, with creation it would be fine, cause 10,000 years ago the sun still would a good size.much more, but ive had a brain fart</blockquote>

[QUOTE="randomco, post: 709477, member: 551938"] fraksured, i dont know if you have heard of him, but there is a doctor by the name of dr. kent hovind who will debate any professor, at any time, and most of the time, he wins. he is creation scientist. here are some examples of how MACRO evolution, and the theory of evolution is impossible first of all the evolution side of things say that the earth is approx 4.6 billion years old, while the creationist say that it cant be more than 10,000 years old. ok 1. the moon has been slowly leaving the earth, about 3 or so feet per year, working backward the moon would have been 3 feet closer last year and so on and so on. with creation thats fine, cause if the earth is only 10g's old then it would still put the moon in a reasonable distance away. with evolutionist the moon would be touching the earths surface as little as 1 million years ago, now if the earth is 4.6 billion years old, how is this possible? 2. the sun has been shrinking over the years, at the rate of its shrinking right now, reversing it again, as little as a couple million years ago, the sun would be so big it would burn up everything, including life. again, with creation it would be fine, cause 10,000 years ago the sun still would a good size. much more, but ive had a brain fart [/QUOTE]

Verification