Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="ahole-ic" data-source="post: 7665906" data-attributes="member: 619324">None of those were insults. Telling someone their argument isn't strong is not ad-hominem. Did I JUST say, your argument is invalid as the other poster's in this thread have attempted to do? No, I give a reason for each thing, and then I will sum it up to clarify that their argument needs work. That is by no means a semi putdown. You are really reaching... oops there I go again. Telling the truth about people is a putdown.I already debunked this myth.Attacks are things that are purely ad hominem. They don't pertain to the discussion at all, but are an attempt to discredit a person based on character rather than the discussion at hand. This is obvious. Arguing the topic and someone's approach to argue the topic is fine. Those are always fair game in any form of debate. It's when you go after the actual person that the problems arise. I waited on you to attack me personally illustrating your clear vendetta against me before I retaliated by telling the truth about you.There you have it. By undeleting what you did, it exposed the fact that I foretold you not moving the thread from the tech section so you would seem justified in banning me. You deleted ONLY the posts of me doing that which makes it obvious what you did there. So... there is one of your lies.I've engaged in plenty of debates without calling people names, but you insist on doing it here in this thread because you're so mad. You're so mad you resurrect debates and then use nothing but putdowns and your mod power. You're a child. I haven't refused to produce anything. Your refusal to acknowledge it doesn't make it so.Where is the "I" in James when people call them Jim? Where is Jack short for John? I can go at this all day, but shortening names doesn't have to use the exact same letters. I have provided examples and sound logic. You have provided nothing other than assumption. See? I explain myself, you say it's not good enough and then lie and say I never explained it at all. You can't possibly still believe you are superior in any fashion.... oh wait that's obvious. That's why you keep digging this up hoping I won't reply to you. I'm honestly astonished you HAVEN'T banned me yet so that I can't continue to parry your constant attempts to save face.That's really odd considering the ban message I received.You clearly have a grudge against me or you wouldn't argue with only me in every thread. You wouldn't wait 24 hours until the thread went another direction and then hijack just to resume attacking me again if you didn't have a grudge. You are masking intolerance with tolerance. If that were not so, you wouldn't be doing exactly what you're doing. I just tell the truth about you every time you single me out.fear of looking justified? I'm guilty of not proof reading before I click save also. LOLI referenced a past thread where you did something you denied doing. You asked for proof. I proved it. Then you bumped the topic and have tried soliciting me to post in it. No amount of lying and spinning can change that so you should stop. lol ---------- Post added at 12:03 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:03 PM ---------- Nobody had called me out at that point. Please show what about the story I changed once called out.</blockquote>

Verification

Top

What's new

Forum list