Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="audioholic" data-source="post: 7665814" data-attributes="member: 549629">Yes I know, me saying you are applying pro-religion spin, and that its not a surprising stance since its becoming more common these days, was a horrible attack against your character. Its not like you told someone they "fail hard" in post #10, that people who oppose you are 'blimdly assuming' facts in post #15, that someone's logic is "so full of holes it's not funny" in post #21, that cotjones has a 'bunch of made up crap' in post #22, that cotjones is an ******* in post #32, etc etc. No, none of those are "attacks", but me saying you are applying pro-religious spin IS an "attack". Double standards. So I looked past all those semi-insulting posts, again many of which are from you, and looked at who started name calling first. Who was that again... oh yeah... you. If you complain that any comments that are of a personal level are "attacks", I suggest you stop making the yourself before claiming the moral high ground. And there is no denying you and you alone raised the bar by calling cotjones an *******, just like you raised the insult bar in the fatmat thread. Hypocrite. Grow some thicker skin, or quit trying to play with the big kids.Where have I lied? Where have I tried to suggest I didnt ask you to 'produce' the thread in question when you claimed I had deleted 'evidence'. Newsflash, I DID challenge you to produce the thread. You produced it, but did NOT produce a single shred of evidence I tried to cover anything up.Its funny the guy who has so little self control he cant engage in a debate without calling people names is saying Im on a tirade. lol As for continuing my 'personal onslaught', again it was you, not me, who brought up a year-old thread and attacked me personally by saying I abused mod powers to cover up evidence you now refuse to produce, discuss, or even acknowledge that I keep asking you to provide.This is why people dont back you up. Audioholic.... where's the "e" bro? Its funny watching you oscillate between claiming it was okay to call me an ******* because you feel its true, and this pathetic attempt to claim you never meant to insinuate the word asshole. Your inability to admit you were trying to call me a name only shows you know you are guilty of it, which only shows me and everyone else here how petty you will act in any attempt to save face.The infraction system. Any other redundant questions you'd like to ask?You keep implying Im dying to ban you, but there is some hidden force stopping me from doing so. There is no hidden force stopping me from banning you. You seem to think I have a grudge against you. The truth is that I dont care enough about you either way to think about you beyond our occasional debates like this one. Clearly its you who has been smoldering about me, for at least a year now.The hidden force you suggest keeps me from banning you is my fear of looking justified. Yet you also claim Im baiting you into responding in the fatmat thread, per my request, so I can ban you. Yeah, that would look way ethical, right? You are delusional.Wait, who resurrected the dead off-topic argument? lol! Dude come on, everyone in this thread knows you brought up the fatmat thread, not me. Everyone here knows you brought it up to defame me and make yourself look artificially oppressed. Why do you think you can simply rewrite what actually happened? Want me to go back and quote where you brought it up, again? lol</blockquote>

Verification

Top

What's new

Forum list