Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
Evil-ution
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="cotjones" data-source="post: 7665649" data-attributes="member: 573988"><p>Mantis, tl;dr</p><p></p><p>I glanced, and saw nothing that wasn't raw conjecture that could be contradicted by evidence.</p><p></p><p>If you'd like me to address specific points please give them to me one or 2 at a time, I don't have time to write a book.</p><p></p><p>Example, your author says that mutations have been induced in fruit flies and most are negative. DUH! I told you that. Population genetics eliminates the majority of the negative mutations that occur, but not the positive ones. Increasing the rate of mutations doesn't ensure faster evolution. Sometimes it can simply insure more mutation and death. X-rays are not a selective factor (unless you become immune to them, lol) A selecting factor would be that if color of flies was black, and a species of bird is introduced that is unable to see red. Red will win out over the other color. Red is a mutation. Flies that have that mutation will be more likely to reproduce and pass it on Simple.</p><p></p><p>I'll debate topics, not books. that's silly</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="cotjones, post: 7665649, member: 573988"] Mantis, tl;dr I glanced, and saw nothing that wasn't raw conjecture that could be contradicted by evidence. If you'd like me to address specific points please give them to me one or 2 at a time, I don't have time to write a book. Example, your author says that mutations have been induced in fruit flies and most are negative. DUH! I told you that. Population genetics eliminates the majority of the negative mutations that occur, but not the positive ones. Increasing the rate of mutations doesn't ensure faster evolution. Sometimes it can simply insure more mutation and death. X-rays are not a selective factor (unless you become immune to them, lol) A selecting factor would be that if color of flies was black, and a species of bird is introduced that is unable to see red. Red will win out over the other color. Red is a mutation. Flies that have that mutation will be more likely to reproduce and pass it on Simple. I'll debate topics, not books. that's silly [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
Evil-ution
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list