Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
Evil-ution
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="cotjones" data-source="post: 7665380" data-attributes="member: 573988"><p>Complete randomness in mutation, not in selection.</p><p></p><p>Dog breeds are artificial selection. Humans selectively breed, for example for small or large size. But because the gene pool is constantly mixed by strays and uncontrolled breeding, yes as you put it they are both dogs. However, this amount of distinction could've gone different. If the two breeds were in complete reproductive isolation they very well likely would no longer be able to form viable zygotes. At that point, you'd have 2 separate species and any new mutations would be solely isolated to the species it occurred in. This has been shown to happen in populations of fruit flies. But the fact that the 2 species can no longer access each others genes means they will very likely given enough time change to occupy their own ecological niche.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="cotjones, post: 7665380, member: 573988"] Complete randomness in mutation, not in selection. Dog breeds are artificial selection. Humans selectively breed, for example for small or large size. But because the gene pool is constantly mixed by strays and uncontrolled breeding, yes as you put it they are both dogs. However, this amount of distinction could've gone different. If the two breeds were in complete reproductive isolation they very well likely would no longer be able to form viable zygotes. At that point, you'd have 2 separate species and any new mutations would be solely isolated to the species it occurred in. This has been shown to happen in populations of fruit flies. But the fact that the 2 species can no longer access each others genes means they will very likely given enough time change to occupy their own ecological niche. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
Evil-ution
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list