Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="cotjones" data-source="post: 7664926" data-attributes="member: 573988">The issue is that evolution IS sufficiently proven and you are basically using the uncertainty principle to try to discredit it. Frankly, give one, JUST one at a time please (lets keep this orderly) piece of evidence that contradicts evolution and I promise you I&#039;ll be able to show the reason it&#039;s not credible. All the evidence you need to see that it does happen I&#039;ve already given you. Here the main points are again.#1. Random mutations always occur. Proven unequivocally.#2. Mutations are positive negative or neutral based on their effect on the organisms suitability for reproduction in it&#039;s environment. Proven#3. Negative mutations tend to be eliminated via selection. Again Proven.#4. Positive mutations tend to remain in the population. Proven#5. Because all living things are coded for by a combination of the same 4 chemicals. Anything has the possibility to change into anything by the re-combination and addition or subtraction of genetic information. Again PRROOOOVENThus, in your opinion. Something that SHOULD happen. IE (If you release a ball in the air, it will fall.), Won&#039;t happen for some reason. And you can articulate no solid reason that it would not.You are a nut job alarmist and you have nothing meaningful to contribute. Come see me when you get brain cancer though.We DO know that gas guzzlers aren&#039;t hurting anything. We know global warming is phony science as proved by the hacked emails of the climate research center in east anglia. We know it was created for political reasons. We know electric cars get their energy from the power grid which operates on fossil fuels and there are several efficiency losses when power is converted. So none of the things you said here are actually smarter.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="cotjones, post: 7664926, member: 573988"] The issue is that evolution IS sufficiently proven and you are basically using the uncertainty principle to try to discredit it. Frankly, give one, JUST one at a time please (lets keep this orderly) piece of evidence that contradicts evolution and I promise you I'll be able to show the reason it's not credible. All the evidence you need to see that it does happen I've already given you. Here the main points are again. #1. Random mutations always occur. Proven unequivocally. #2. Mutations are positive negative or neutral based on their effect on the organisms suitability for reproduction in it's environment. Proven #3. Negative mutations tend to be eliminated via selection. Again Proven. #4. Positive mutations tend to remain in the population. Proven #5. Because all living things are coded for by a combination of the same 4 chemicals. Anything has the possibility to change into anything by the re-combination and addition or subtraction of genetic information. Again PRROOOOVEN Thus, in your opinion. Something that SHOULD happen. IE (If you release a ball in the air, it will fall.), Won't happen for some reason. And you can articulate no solid reason that it would not. You are a nut job alarmist and you have nothing meaningful to contribute. Come see me when you get brain cancer though. We DO know that gas guzzlers aren't hurting anything. We know global warming is phony science as proved by the hacked emails of the climate research center in east anglia. We know it was created for political reasons. We know electric cars get their energy from the power grid which operates on fossil fuels and there are several efficiency losses when power is converted. So none of the things you said here are actually smarter. [/QUOTE]

Verification