Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
Evil-ution
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="cotjones" data-source="post: 7664643" data-attributes="member: 573988"><p>The problem with eCrack is that he is letting personal bias dictate an alarmist's position.</p><p></p><p>Again Wisdom is a line between knowledge and faith.</p><p></p><p>Every single piece of science or anything you do relies to some extent of faith. Like I said, you can't know for sure that your chair will support you.</p><p></p><p>The alarmist's position is ineffective and counter-productive because it is possible to discredit any theory based on the principles of uncertainty.</p><p></p><p>However, this will cause the rejection of any theory which presents a personal disadvantage to the individual.</p><p></p><p>He subconsciously has a twisted standard of evidence in the subject. He ignores that fact that medical science, anthropology, Biology, and pretty much any other theory that deals with life (even Communications) relies at least in part, on the theory of evolution. The Validity of the theory is far within any sort of objective standard of judgment you might come to, unless of course you establish your standard at a UFO convention.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="cotjones, post: 7664643, member: 573988"] The problem with eCrack is that he is letting personal bias dictate an alarmist's position. Again Wisdom is a line between knowledge and faith. Every single piece of science or anything you do relies to some extent of faith. Like I said, you can't know for sure that your chair will support you. The alarmist's position is ineffective and counter-productive because it is possible to discredit any theory based on the principles of uncertainty. However, this will cause the rejection of any theory which presents a personal disadvantage to the individual. He subconsciously has a twisted standard of evidence in the subject. He ignores that fact that medical science, anthropology, Biology, and pretty much any other theory that deals with life (even Communications) relies at least in part, on the theory of evolution. The Validity of the theory is far within any sort of objective standard of judgment you might come to, unless of course you establish your standard at a UFO convention. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
Evil-ution
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list