Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="ahole-ic" data-source="post: 7664560" data-attributes="member: 619324">You did and you lied about it. It was in the sound deadener showdown thread where i exposed don aka rudy for what he is. You circled the wagons, I proved you wrong. You deleted the posts. It's all right there in that thread. It's not personal, it's just who you are. You became mod and in an effort to not get banned everyone circle jerks you but you think you're the utmost authority on everything. You think you're much smarter than you actually are, and with these posts, you are arguing me based on something I have not said... because you assume that's what i believe. Your arrogance is unparalleled. Pull those gloves off. Dollars to donuts in the rest of this post, it will be the same irrelevant drivel.These sentences were the only part of your reply that is even somewhat relevant. Science is supposed to demand proof. Instead, you have a theory from darwin, and since then a bunch of scientists trying to find evidence to support this theory. Science is supposed to work the other way. Things are supposed to be observed that lead to a conclusion. darwin came up with his theory prior to DNA and RNA were able to be observed, thus proving that the theory was created prior to any way to support it. Don't get all self righteous thinking you're dropping some big knowledge bomb. Apply what you're saying to your own point of view and you'll realize what you believe DOES require faith. It hasn't been proved. There actually is nothing there to even give it reasonable credibility. It's circumstantial evidence that people say can lead to only 1 conclusion, when in fact there is not enough data to point it at any conclusion at all. Science is NOT about attempting to draw conclusions with too little data and coming up with a theory and then saying "that must be right because it's a theory and we all know nothing can ever be proved (if that were true why even have science? lol)" You guys talk all over yourselves thinking you're vastly superior beings, yet you don't realize how contradictory what you're saying is.You just told me that the theory of evolution cannot be proved. It is a theory and because of that it's as good as it gets etc yet you insist it is true. That is faith pal. No matter how you try to spin it... it is faith. You believe something without having any proof. FAITH.I haven't argued any of this, so I don't have to prove it. You're going out of your way to frame my argument around proving religion, when I've never argued religion at all. It's clear this is your attempt to take the focus off of the fact that you cannot provide any sort of proof of evolution, yet you believe it based on faith.To believe evolution without anything there to show you it's real, it's faith... You have FAILED to show how it is different than religion. I am in here showing how your faith is absurd and you're slandering me saying I'm defending religion, when really I'm in here knocking yours. So how does science welcome opposition? There was a link posted showing a scientist just trashing Christians but moreso anyone who doesn't believe in evolution. That is not welcoming an opposing view.I don't have to prove anything about creationism because I haven't argued it. Again, you made it up so you'd have SOMETHING to argue. All I can tell you is evolution isn't proved at all. It was a theory developed before the science existed to observe the circumstantial evidence that scientists tout as compelling. Clearly showing the conclusion was drawn and then evidence was gathered to support it. This is all true and cannot be disputed, yet everyone will because I'm attacking their religion and they are not open to other ideas.Totally irrelevant. The failures of science aren't ok just because you wish I was arguing for some religion. lol ---------- Post added at 01:05 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:04 PM ---------- Not a shred of this post was relevant.</blockquote>

Verification

Top

What's new

Forum list