Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
Evil-ution
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="audioholic" data-source="post: 7664559" data-attributes="member: 549629"><p>This is the entire crux of the fallacy that is science is no better than religion based on relying on faith. Again, evolution is defined as a theory in the scientific community because science relies on irrefutable testing and verification. Religion is not bound by any such sensible rules. Science welcomes alternative theories, in a search for truth. Religion says 'believe or else'. But because not every single scientist agrees, you claim this is some sort of proof that what none of those scientists have said (that God or Heaven exists) must be true.</p><p></p><p>Lets try this from another angle. Instead of trying to prove Gob to us by disproving Science, how about PROVING God to us on the merits of its own theory...? All religion seems to have to hold on to these days is, again, the table scraps science leaves for it. Oh okay, science has proven what the sun in the sky is, well then the bible was referring to a metaphor when mentioning the sun. But oh okay, something science hasnt proven yet must mean the bible is being literal and accurate. Im sure thats exactly what religious people 150 years ago said when it was suggested the Earth was not the center of the universe.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="audioholic, post: 7664559, member: 549629"] This is the entire crux of the fallacy that is science is no better than religion based on relying on faith. Again, evolution is defined as a theory in the scientific community because science relies on irrefutable testing and verification. Religion is not bound by any such sensible rules. Science welcomes alternative theories, in a search for truth. Religion says 'believe or else'. But because not every single scientist agrees, you claim this is some sort of proof that what none of those scientists have said (that God or Heaven exists) must be true. Lets try this from another angle. Instead of trying to prove Gob to us by disproving Science, how about PROVING God to us on the merits of its own theory...? All religion seems to have to hold on to these days is, again, the table scraps science leaves for it. Oh okay, science has proven what the sun in the sky is, well then the bible was referring to a metaphor when mentioning the sun. But oh okay, something science hasnt proven yet must mean the bible is being literal and accurate. Im sure thats exactly what religious people 150 years ago said when it was suggested the Earth was not the center of the universe. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
Evil-ution
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list