Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="pro-rabbit" data-source="post: 7664555" data-attributes="member: 551878">Actually you are wrong. My standpoint is that science allows something to be a theory if it meets a few requirements. However, it will not be a law until it can be proven. Yes there are people in the science community that do not agree with all parts of any theory of evolution.What is funny is that you are grasping at straws here to try and break down what anyone says. However, it will not work with the way you are attempting. There is nothing to break down here. I&#039;m sorry that you feel the need to attempt to make the world see your flawed view point, but as it is everyone has their own idea on everything. So everything you think you are doing from an &quot;intelligent&quot; stand point is folly.Perhaps if you were a science major and had any type of evidence to say evolution is 100% false then you would have a leg to stand on. However you can not prove nothing other then that you like to argue.Another part of your reply that makes no since that you go into to random claims from basic people. We are discussing scientists and you are discussing the common man who has limited knowledge about what they see/hear/taste what ever. Why would you stretch out your position to include such an idea as that has nothing to do with the discussion at hand.Another issue is that Darwin is not the only theory of evolution.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="pro-rabbit, post: 7664555, member: 551878"] Actually you are wrong. My standpoint is that science allows something to be a theory if it meets a few requirements. However, it will not be a law until it can be proven. Yes there are people in the science community that do not agree with all parts of any theory of evolution. What is funny is that you are grasping at straws here to try and break down what anyone says. However, it will not work with the way you are attempting. There is nothing to break down here. I'm sorry that you feel the need to attempt to make the world see your flawed view point, but as it is everyone has their own idea on everything. So everything you think you are doing from an "intelligent" stand point is folly. Perhaps if you were a science major and had any type of evidence to say evolution is 100% false then you would have a leg to stand on. However you can not prove nothing other then that you like to argue. Another part of your reply that makes no since that you go into to random claims from basic people. We are discussing scientists and you are discussing the common man who has limited knowledge about what they see/hear/taste what ever. Why would you stretch out your position to include such an idea as that has nothing to do with the discussion at hand. Another issue is that Darwin is not the only theory of evolution. [/QUOTE]

Verification