Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="audioholic" data-source="post: 7664334" data-attributes="member: 549629">&quot;1&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.2&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.3&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; And God said, Let there be light: 2 Cor. 4.6 and there was light.4&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; And God saw the light, that it was good: and God divided the light from the darkness.5&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And the evening and the morning were the first day.&quot; - <a href="http://www.bartleby.com/108/01/1.html" target="_blank">Genesis 1. The Holy Bible: King James Version.</a>If a day is like a 1000 years, and a 1000 years is like a day, why does the bible use an obviously irrelevant term like &quot;7 days&quot; at all? If we are going to say that even specific things written in the bible can be reinterpreted once science casts doubts on its content, is the bible an acceptable reference in any way at all?If God set evolution in motion, once again the content in the bible is apparently completely false and irrelevant in any sort of fact based reference. Evolution and the story of creationism cannot coexist. One says whales and birds were among the first creatures to inhabit the Earth, the other proves there was a time creatures roamed the Earth long before whales or birds.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="audioholic, post: 7664334, member: 549629"] "1 In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. 2 And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters. 3 And God said, Let there be light: 2 Cor. 4.6 and there was light. 4 And God saw the light, that it was good: and God divided the light from the darkness. 5 And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. [B]And the evening and the morning were the first day[/B]." - [URL="http://www.bartleby.com/108/01/1.html"]Genesis 1. The Holy Bible: King James Version.[/URL] If a day is like a 1000 years, and a 1000 years is like a day, why does the bible use an obviously irrelevant term like "7 days" at all? If we are going to say that even specific things written in the bible can be reinterpreted once science casts doubts on its content, is the bible an acceptable reference in any way at all? If God set evolution in motion, once again the content in the bible is apparently completely false and irrelevant in any sort of fact based reference. Evolution and the story of creationism cannot coexist. One says whales and birds were among the first creatures to inhabit the Earth, the other proves there was a time creatures roamed the Earth long before whales or birds. [/QUOTE]

Verification