Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="ahole-ic" data-source="post: 7663533" data-attributes="member: 619324">You just proved my point. You could not know they are purely random. You merely observe no discernable pattern and deem them random. So, you calling them random simply you don't understand why they are doing what they are doing. If they were truly random, that would disprove the theory of evolution altogether, because a random mutation would more times than not, result in a change that was less than ideal for the organism to survive. IE a deep ocean fish developing lungs.Exactly why it is ridiculous to assume that because 2 organisms share some of the same stuff, that they have some sort of historical relationship.I missed no points, but it's clear that you did.... and you ignored my question.</blockquote>

Top