Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Help
Enclosure Design & Construction
Enclosures - Mfg's recommendation or calculated?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="n2audio" data-source="post: 4792504" data-attributes="member: 540940"><p>Hi - I was never much of an enclosure geek, but now that I've been messing with some numbers (ported) it seems that what winISD spits out as the "ideal" enclosure is never what the mfg recommends, or even close to it in most cases. And when you use the mfg's volume/port dims the response curve is sometimes completely out of whack.</p><p></p><p>Why are they so different? Which is generally the better way to go?</p><p></p><p>Of what value is an enclosure that yeilds a flat response curve if the mfg's recommendation (which I assume has been tested to some degree) looks very irregular but supposedly gives the best overall performance?</p><p></p><p>For example, here are some enclosures for my particular sub...</p><p></p><p><img src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v637/Liquid_force/HRWDC12boxcomparisons.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></p><p></p><p>The colors washed out, but the green line is the box I built, the blue (right) line is what the mfg suggests, and the yellow line (middle) is just something in between I added for comparison.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="n2audio, post: 4792504, member: 540940"] Hi - I was never much of an enclosure geek, but now that I've been messing with some numbers (ported) it seems that what winISD spits out as the "ideal" enclosure is never what the mfg recommends, or even close to it in most cases. And when you use the mfg's volume/port dims the response curve is sometimes completely out of whack. Why are they so different? Which is generally the better way to go? Of what value is an enclosure that yeilds a flat response curve if the mfg's recommendation (which I assume has been tested to some degree) looks very irregular but supposedly gives the best overall performance? For example, here are some enclosures for my particular sub... [IMG]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v637/Liquid_force/HRWDC12boxcomparisons.jpg[/IMG] The colors washed out, but the green line is the box I built, the blue (right) line is what the mfg suggests, and the yellow line (middle) is just something in between I added for comparison. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Help
Enclosure Design & Construction
Enclosures - Mfg's recommendation or calculated?
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list