Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Toxic Tuan" data-source="post: 6738255" data-attributes="member: 558678">Stage A:&nbsp; EnclosureStage B:&nbsp; Environment (vehicle)I do have many data for all sorts of vehicles.&nbsp; The environment is the vehicle&#039;s resonant frequency and cabin size and orientation.&nbsp; This is a completely different part of&nbsp; the design stage.&nbsp; As mentioned above, my testings of the pito tubes only reflects the internals.The box internal flow has NOTHING to do with the vehicle (environment):&nbsp; Fluid Dynamics 101 - Flow in a Pipe.&nbsp; A more laminar flow profile will result in a better output...period.&nbsp; This is within the capabilities of the enclosure.&nbsp; A turbulent flow with major head loss will result in a low output no matter what environment it is in.&nbsp; This is 2 entirely different stages.You fail to understand my tests and make huge assumptions without knowing any details.&nbsp; And you certainly underestimate my capabilities.Tuan</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Toxic Tuan, post: 6738255, member: 558678"] Stage A: Enclosure Stage B: Environment (vehicle) I do have many data for all sorts of vehicles. The environment is the vehicle's resonant frequency and cabin size and orientation. This is a completely different part of the design stage. As mentioned above, my testings of the pito tubes only reflects the internals. The box internal flow has NOTHING to do with the vehicle (environment): Fluid Dynamics 101 - Flow in a Pipe. A more laminar flow profile will result in a better output...period. This is within the capabilities of the enclosure. A turbulent flow with major head loss will result in a low output no matter what environment it is in. This is 2 entirely different stages. You fail to understand my tests and make huge assumptions without knowing any details. And you certainly underestimate my capabilities. Tuan [/QUOTE]

Verification