Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="shredder1" data-source="post: 8879104" data-attributes="member: 658920">Did my previous post answer your question? Aeroports are a science, finding that velocity that pushes but negates chuffing. I sometimes design 3&quot; ext flares /w/ 2&quot; internal flares on a 5.9&quot; port. Ask yourself how that looks... its a HUGE flare (12&quot;) on a 6&quot; port basically... lol. Something that can more equate to velocities equating to a&nbsp; usual to a 7.92&quot; 8&quot; round?&nbsp; But round recommendations from manufacturers prickle my pickle usually. Plus those ol&#039; recommendations usually are lower power. I actually hate rounds and the bad info they produce, flare that chit I say... and make the flare as big as possible. I take airspace/tuning then build something special, unless impossible I design around any compromises and try to balance airspace /w/ tuning. Proof is in the pudding so to speak. I wouldn&#039;t post designs without a hi-level of confidence in every design.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="shredder1, post: 8879104, member: 658920"] Did my previous post answer your question? Aeroports are a science, finding that velocity that pushes but negates chuffing. I sometimes design 3" ext flares /w/ 2" internal flares on a 5.9" port. Ask yourself how that looks... its a HUGE flare (12") on a 6" port basically... lol. Something that can more equate to velocities equating to a usual to a 7.92" 8" round? But round recommendations from manufacturers prickle my pickle usually. Plus those ol' recommendations usually are lower power. I actually hate rounds and the bad info they produce, flare that chit I say... and make the flare as big as possible. I take airspace/tuning then build something special, unless impossible I design around any compromises and try to balance airspace /w/ tuning. Proof is in the pudding so to speak. I wouldn't post designs without a hi-level of confidence in every design. [/QUOTE]

Verification