Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
Election 2012
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="stocker08" data-source="post: 7921159" data-attributes="member: 577940"><p>No, I get that logic. In some ways it makes sense, but there are some major distinctions. Corporations are not simply a pass through entity from the market to the individuals. Do the Corporations get taxed, of course. But they also are offered all sorts of rights and protections not offered to individuals. One main reason for the dividend tax, is because otherwise it would be one more tax-free source of income for the richest folks in america. The largest portion of shareholders in dividend paying companies happen to be trusts whose beneficiaries are the descendents of company founders.</p><p></p><p>How about the unintended consequences of tax-free dividends? Executives giving themselves bonuses in the form of shares producing tax-free dividends. This could encourage corporations to pay out larger dividends at the expense of the corps long term outlook. Let's keep in mind, dividends are voluntary. So what would a corporation do to make their share prices go up? They could pay large voluntary dividends to drive demand in favor of their shares. Earnings growth should drive stock prices, not the promise of temporary high dividend payments.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="stocker08, post: 7921159, member: 577940"] No, I get that logic. In some ways it makes sense, but there are some major distinctions. Corporations are not simply a pass through entity from the market to the individuals. Do the Corporations get taxed, of course. But they also are offered all sorts of rights and protections not offered to individuals. One main reason for the dividend tax, is because otherwise it would be one more tax-free source of income for the richest folks in america. The largest portion of shareholders in dividend paying companies happen to be trusts whose beneficiaries are the descendents of company founders. How about the unintended consequences of tax-free dividends? Executives giving themselves bonuses in the form of shares producing tax-free dividends. This could encourage corporations to pay out larger dividends at the expense of the corps long term outlook. Let's keep in mind, dividends are voluntary. So what would a corporation do to make their share prices go up? They could pay large voluntary dividends to drive demand in favor of their shares. Earnings growth should drive stock prices, not the promise of temporary high dividend payments. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
Election 2012
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list