Menu
Forum
What's new
New posts
Live Activity
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Classifieds Member Feedback
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
Car Audio Build Logs
Car Audio Equipment
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Help
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Car Audio Classifieds
Car Audio Wanted
Classifieds Member Feedback
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Test
Forum
Search
Search titles only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
Search
Search titles only
Search titles only
What's new
New posts
Live Activity
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Classifieds Member Feedback
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Equipment
Head Units
Effects of Compression
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ngsm13" data-source="post: 1091699" data-attributes="member: 544830"><p>Continued...</p><p></p><p><strong>256 FhG:</strong></p><p></p><p><a href="http://img160.imageshack.us/my.php?image=256fhgjx5.png" target="_blank"><img src="http://img160.imageshack.us/img160/8060/256fhgjx5.th.png" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></a></p><p></p><p><strong>320 LAME:</strong></p><p></p><p><a href="http://img462.imageshack.us/my.php?image=320lamelg3.png" target="_blank"><img src="http://img462.imageshack.us/img462/6236/320lamelg3.th.png" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></a></p><p></p><p><strong>320 FhG:</strong></p><p></p><p><a href="http://img473.imageshack.us/my.php?image=320fhghr1.png" target="_blank"><img src="http://img473.imageshack.us/img473/6886/320fhghr1.th.png" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></a></p><p></p><p><strong>V0</strong> (preset extreme, aka <strong>apx</strong>):</p><p></p><p><a href="http://img462.imageshack.us/my.php?image=v0presetextremels8.png" target="_blank"><img src="http://img462.imageshack.us/img462/3979/v0presetextremels8.th.png" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></a></p><p></p><p><strong>Typical Webrip: (notice the gap)</strong></p><p></p><p><a href="http://img160.imageshack.us/my.php?image=typicalwebripfp7.png" target="_blank"><img src="http://img160.imageshack.us/img160/8761/typicalwebripfp7.th.png" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></a></p><p></p><p><strong>Analysis</strong></p><p></p><p>As you can see, LAME uses 'full resolution' up to the frequency threshold, whereas FhG, encodes at 'full resolution' up to 16kHz, and uses 'low resolution' at higher frequencies. This is an easy way to tell which encoder was used. At 128kbps, LAME uses a LPF at ~17kHz and FhG at ~16kHz. I have included a screenshot of FhG at 128kbps without the LPF. At 160kbps FhG's LPF is set at 20kHz. At 192kbps, LAME stops at 19kHz and FhG encodes upto 22kHz.</p><p></p><p>FhG looks like it's not doing its job right, but if you listen to the 192kbps samples, you can hardly tell which is LAME and which is FhG. At 128kbps, LAME sounds a bit better, more 'clear'. FhG encoding at 128kbps without the LPF sounds bad, you can certainly listen to the artifacts.</p><p></p><p>LAME APS will typically use a LPF at 18.5kHz, whereas APX will go up to 19kHz.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ngsm13, post: 1091699, member: 544830"] Continued... [B]256 FhG:[/B] [URL="http://img160.imageshack.us/my.php?image=256fhgjx5.png"][IMG]http://img160.imageshack.us/img160/8060/256fhgjx5.th.png[/IMG][/URL] [B]320 LAME:[/B] [URL="http://img462.imageshack.us/my.php?image=320lamelg3.png"][IMG]http://img462.imageshack.us/img462/6236/320lamelg3.th.png[/IMG][/URL] [B]320 FhG:[/B] [URL="http://img473.imageshack.us/my.php?image=320fhghr1.png"][IMG]http://img473.imageshack.us/img473/6886/320fhghr1.th.png[/IMG][/URL] [B]V0[/B] (preset extreme, aka [B]apx[/B]): [URL="http://img462.imageshack.us/my.php?image=v0presetextremels8.png"][IMG]http://img462.imageshack.us/img462/3979/v0presetextremels8.th.png[/IMG][/URL] [B]Typical Webrip: (notice the gap)[/B] [URL="http://img160.imageshack.us/my.php?image=typicalwebripfp7.png"][IMG]http://img160.imageshack.us/img160/8761/typicalwebripfp7.th.png[/IMG][/URL] [B]Analysis[/B] As you can see, LAME uses 'full resolution' up to the frequency threshold, whereas FhG, encodes at 'full resolution' up to 16kHz, and uses 'low resolution' at higher frequencies. This is an easy way to tell which encoder was used. At 128kbps, LAME uses a LPF at ~17kHz and FhG at ~16kHz. I have included a screenshot of FhG at 128kbps without the LPF. At 160kbps FhG's LPF is set at 20kHz. At 192kbps, LAME stops at 19kHz and FhG encodes upto 22kHz. FhG looks like it's not doing its job right, but if you listen to the 192kbps samples, you can hardly tell which is LAME and which is FhG. At 128kbps, LAME sounds a bit better, more 'clear'. FhG encoding at 128kbps without the LPF sounds bad, you can certainly listen to the artifacts. LAME APS will typically use a LPF at 18.5kHz, whereas APX will go up to 19kHz. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Equipment
Head Units
Effects of Compression
Top
Menu
Home
Refresh