Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="audioholic" data-source="post: 2862693" data-attributes="member: 549629">My neutral comment was not directed at you.I dont believe Ive said you have no right to state your experience with eD. Im not trying to unfairly bias the discussion against eD, I think eD does enough to bias people against them on their own.As Ive already stated, I have no issue with people (like you, I stated you by name) who purchase and have good experience with eD products. I wont (probably), that&#039;s my choice and you make yours. That&#039;s not the point here. The point is someone trying to tell people, some of which may not know otherwise, that eD has a good rep. A good rep from a couple guys in this thread does not surmount the overwhelming evidence and negative will against the company for previous, and continuing practices.eD hasn&#039;t ripped you too guys off before, Im glad for you (no sarcasm). But, if you&#039;d chosen to purchase their &#039;butyl rubber based&#039; deadening mat a cpl years ago, Ben and eD would have GLADLY taken your money like chumps. If this doesn&#039;t bother you, simply because you have made good purchases with eD (their eu700&#039;s and&nbsp; nine.2 amps seem to be nice products), then well... that&#039;s your choice.This arguement isn&#039;t about which choice is made, or the right to do so. Its about misinforming people. Stating eD has a good rep is misinforming them.. well those who have been under a rock the last couple years and didn&#039;t already know themselves. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif I just find it hard, even for an eD fan, to say eD has a positive rep. You can say they are turning it around, make solid equip for the money no matter what the history was, etc etc... but to say they have a good solid reputation, well that&#039;s just not true. Again not speaking about you (but answering you), Im talking about rsx&#039;s comments/attitude.Cheers.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="audioholic, post: 2862693, member: 549629"] My neutral comment was not directed at you. I dont believe Ive said you have no right to state your experience with eD. Im not trying to unfairly bias the discussion against eD, I think eD does enough to bias people against them on their own. As Ive already stated, I have no issue with people (like you, I stated you by name) who purchase and have good experience with eD products. I wont (probably), that's my choice and you make yours. That's not the point here. The point is someone trying to tell people, some of which may not know otherwise, that eD has a good rep. A good rep from a couple guys in this thread does not surmount the overwhelming evidence and negative will against the company for previous, and continuing practices. eD hasn't ripped you too guys off before, Im glad for you (no sarcasm). But, if you'd chosen to purchase their 'butyl rubber based' deadening mat a cpl years ago, Ben and eD would have GLADLY taken your money like chumps. If this doesn't bother you, simply because you have made good purchases with eD (their eu700's and nine.2 amps seem to be nice products), then well... that's your choice. This arguement isn't about which choice is made, or the right to do so. Its about misinforming people. Stating eD has a good rep is misinforming them.. well those who have been under a rock the last couple years and didn't already know themselves. [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif[/IMG] I just find it hard, even for an eD fan, to say eD has a positive rep. You can say they are turning it around, make solid equip for the money no matter what the history was, etc etc... but to say they have a good solid reputation, well that's just not true. Again not speaking about you (but answering you), Im talking about rsx's comments/attitude. Cheers. [/QUOTE]

Verification