Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="CELLERBR" data-source="post: 2367699" data-attributes="member: 549917"><p>Any high excursion sub that uses a tall roll surround instead of a wide roll surround will have that dimpling. Such as the Massive CW, IDMAX (which in my opinion is a much better driver the the W7), Any TC sounds sub from the TC3000 and up, the TC 3hps did as well, I am sure there are many more too. All of the ones I mentioned are very capable subs. There are many benefits to a tall roll surround (the dimples are a side effect that really cause no ill affects). For example (and someone more learned than I correct me if I am wrong on this). A sub with a Tall Roll surround compared to a sub with a wide roll surround of the same size w/the same amound of linear excursion will displace more air due to the fact it has more SD with the same amount of XMAX.....Telegon I think you are a tool and you have no clue what the hell you are talking about and you should quit now while you can still save some face.</p></blockquote><p></p>

[QUOTE="CELLERBR, post: 2367699, member: 549917"] Any high excursion sub that uses a tall roll surround instead of a wide roll surround will have that dimpling. Such as the Massive CW, IDMAX (which in my opinion is a much better driver the the W7), Any TC sounds sub from the TC3000 and up, the TC 3hps did as well, I am sure there are many more too. All of the ones I mentioned are very capable subs. There are many benefits to a tall roll surround (the dimples are a side effect that really cause no ill affects). For example (and someone more learned than I correct me if I am wrong on this). A sub with a Tall Roll surround compared to a sub with a wide roll surround of the same size w/the same amound of linear excursion will displace more air due to the fact it has more SD with the same amount of XMAX.....Telegon I think you are a tool and you have no clue what the hell you are talking about and you should quit now while you can still save some face. [/QUOTE]

Verification