Menu
Forum
What's new
New posts
Live Activity
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Classifieds Member Feedback
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
Car Audio Build Logs
Car Audio Equipment
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Help
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Car Audio Classifieds
Car Audio Wanted
Classifieds Member Feedback
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Join
Test
Forum
Search
Search titles only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
Search
Search titles only
Search titles only
What's new
New posts
Live Activity
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Classifieds Member Feedback
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
eDead UE, my thoughts...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="NoobieAudio" data-source="post: 4214925" data-attributes="member: 588161"><p>well, i see lots of tests and what not, that judge the "quality" of products or ability to withstand certain things. this one was as good as any. the heat one was important to me because i live in arizona and in my garage it can reach tempatures or 140F. so i can see eDead wouldn't last me long at all. but besides all the rather useful test the most important thing for me is to know if a product does't what i buy it for. and that is to improve sound quality. if anyone has set up testor knows someone who has set up tests to acually mearsure the efficientcy of a product let me know. for all we know, the compound used in the eDead that makes it turn black and slimy in Turpentine could be the what makes it more efficient at absorbing vibrations or blocking out sound waves. it seems to me, with the turpentine test in particular, that the Damp Pro started to look more pourous which would in turn allow more sound to be passed through it. i understand it might be a more durable compund but if that feature will cause me to lose its affectiveness over time i don't think the product it worth it. anyway im just rant quick thoughts that popped into my head, nothing REALLY well thought out. wanted to put my two cents in and hoping to find more in depth testing towards acual funtionality of products. i have heard cars fully done with Damp Pro and some fully done with Dyna Xtreme. i thought the Dyanamat sounded most effective but test show that it doesn't hold up as well as damp pro but still holds up more then needed.</p><p></p><p>blah blah blah. someone help?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="NoobieAudio, post: 4214925, member: 588161"] well, i see lots of tests and what not, that judge the "quality" of products or ability to withstand certain things. this one was as good as any. the heat one was important to me because i live in arizona and in my garage it can reach tempatures or 140F. so i can see eDead wouldn't last me long at all. but besides all the rather useful test the most important thing for me is to know if a product does't what i buy it for. and that is to improve sound quality. if anyone has set up testor knows someone who has set up tests to acually mearsure the efficientcy of a product let me know. for all we know, the compound used in the eDead that makes it turn black and slimy in Turpentine could be the what makes it more efficient at absorbing vibrations or blocking out sound waves. it seems to me, with the turpentine test in particular, that the Damp Pro started to look more pourous which would in turn allow more sound to be passed through it. i understand it might be a more durable compund but if that feature will cause me to lose its affectiveness over time i don't think the product it worth it. anyway im just rant quick thoughts that popped into my head, nothing REALLY well thought out. wanted to put my two cents in and hoping to find more in depth testing towards acual funtionality of products. i have heard cars fully done with Damp Pro and some fully done with Dyna Xtreme. i thought the Dyanamat sounded most effective but test show that it doesn't hold up as well as damp pro but still holds up more then needed. blah blah blah. someone help? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
eDead UE, my thoughts...
Top
Menu
Home
Refresh