Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="audioholic" data-source="post: 5308975" data-attributes="member: 549629">Thicker must mean better, right? Material density and quality, adhesion properties, and foil type/thickness really mean squat, its all about the 80 and 120 mil specs. Or so eD would have you believe.And furthermore, why would anyone ever trust a company again who has admitted they previously weighed other versions, for advertised specs, with the backing layer still applied, and even with the center cardboard tube still inserted? oops? Why would you ever trust to buy deadener again from a company who out and out lied about the material make-up of previous versions in a blatant attempt to fool the consumer into purchasing an inferior product? Has this company not done enough to justify looking beyond their advertised specs and question the quality, not just quantity?&nbsp; Apparently not, because plenty of people are still buying their crap, and then having to come here and tell us how it literally peels apart from itself (let alone the contact surface).eD should have just gotten out of the deadener market after their previous antics were discovered. But apparently there are plenty of suckers in this world ready to hop right back on whatever advertising BS bandwagon they want to lay out. Oh... its 120 mil thick... ohhhhh ahhhhh!I give their new deadener mats, and the company themselves, 2 thumbs down. And one middle finger up.Hope Ive made my feelings clear enough.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="audioholic, post: 5308975, member: 549629"] Thicker must mean better, right? Material density and quality, adhesion properties, and foil type/thickness really mean squat, its all about the 80 and 120 mil specs. Or so eD would have you believe. And furthermore, why would anyone ever trust a company again who has admitted they previously weighed other versions, for [B]advertised specs[/B], with the backing layer still applied, and even with the center cardboard tube still inserted? oops? Why would you ever trust to buy deadener again from a company who out and out lied about the material make-up of previous versions in a [B]blatant[/B] attempt to fool the consumer into purchasing an inferior product? Has this company not done enough to justify looking beyond their advertised specs and question the quality, not just quantity? Apparently not, because plenty of people are still buying their [B]crap[/B], and then having to come here and tell us how it literally peels apart from itself (let alone the contact surface). eD should have just gotten out of the deadener market after their previous antics were discovered. But apparently there are plenty of suckers in this world ready to hop right back on whatever advertising BS bandwagon they want to lay out. Oh... its 120 mil thick... ohhhhh ahhhhh! I give their new deadener mats, and the company themselves, 2 thumbs down. And one middle finger up. Hope Ive made my feelings clear enough. [/QUOTE]

Verification