Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="3.5Max6spd" data-source="post: 837640" data-attributes="member: 555373">lol- so whats the purpose of the BLA? to &#039;balance&#039; a&nbsp; balanced signal? makes no sense....if so there would be no need for the BLATrust me Hoot we are simply having a discussion.Hoot I see your argument as far as the &#039;line driver&#039; thing...I may be wrong in those regards(specially after visually being able to see with that schematic I dug up) but apparently you can only see 16v out of those outputs using only the BLA.&nbsp; Take this scenario- we are not talking L&amp;amp; R signals only here- we are talking + and - that are separated intentionally for each side (right orleft) to make up the signal as a whole- obviouslyeach set of RCA&#039;s is not there to be hooked up to an amplifier to split the sources signal to different amplifiers. One thing is for sure- you need the BLA TO ACHIEVE 16v AND TO ACHIEVE balanced signal</blockquote>

[QUOTE="3.5Max6spd, post: 837640, member: 555373"] lol- so whats the purpose of the BLA? to 'balance' a balanced signal? makes no sense....if so there would be no need for the BLA Trust me Hoot we are simply having a discussion. Hoot I see your argument as far as the 'line driver' thing...I may be wrong in those regards(specially after visually being able to see with that schematic I dug up) but apparently you can only see 16v out of those outputs using only the BLA. Take this scenario- we are not talking L& R signals only here- we are talking + and - that are separated intentionally for each side (right orleft) to make up the signal as a whole- obviously each set of RCA's is not there to be hooked up to an amplifier to split the sources signal to different amplifiers. One thing is for sure- you need the BLA TO ACHIEVE 16v AND TO ACHIEVE balanced signal [/QUOTE]

Verification