Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="helotaxi" data-source="post: 7110745" data-attributes="member: 550915">WTF???&nbsp; I merely told you that you were misinformed.&nbsp; If you think that is infringing your &quot;rights&quot; perhaps you need to learn what your actual rights are.&nbsp; Regardless that still doesn&#039;t make what you&#039;re saying correct.&nbsp; It has nothing to do with you.&nbsp; It isn&#039;t all about you regardless of your inflated sense of self worth, which I would argue is somewhat misplaced.You keep stating your opinion, that is completely contrary to the results of numerous studies and countless experiments by actual audio engineers who know much more than I do and exponentially more than you, and trying to pass it off as fact.&nbsp; The only fact is that regardless of what you think to be the case, you have NO facts to back it up.&nbsp; If you have never heard a 2-way component set that is perfectly capable of playing down to 50Hz or so and still smooth through the midrange at moderate volume, then you really have no basis for you argument.&nbsp; There are TONS of such components on the market.&nbsp; I told you exactly what is needed, a tweeter that can play low enough that you can keep the mid out of cone breakup.&nbsp; With a good mid, 2.5kHz is plenty low for the tweet.&nbsp; Look at the winning SQ cars on the circuit.&nbsp; VERY few of them run a 3-way front stage and those that do try to cross the mid as low as possible on the low side and as high as possible on the high side.&nbsp; The overall objective is still the same, get one driver to play as much of the frequency spectrum as possible.And ramos&#039;s response curve is WAY flatter than yours.&nbsp; You&#039;re almost 10dB down above 4kHz.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="helotaxi, post: 7110745, member: 550915"] WTF??? I merely told you that you were misinformed. If you think that is infringing your "rights" perhaps you need to learn what your actual rights are. Regardless that still doesn't make what you're saying correct. It has nothing to do with you. It isn't all about you regardless of your inflated sense of self worth, which I would argue is somewhat misplaced. You keep stating your opinion, that is completely contrary to the results of numerous studies and countless experiments by actual audio engineers who know much more than I do and exponentially more than you, and trying to pass it off as fact. The only fact is that regardless of what you think to be the case, you have NO facts to back it up. If you have never heard a 2-way component set that is perfectly capable of playing down to 50Hz or so and still smooth through the midrange at moderate volume, then you really have no basis for you argument. There are TONS of such components on the market. I told you exactly what is needed, a tweeter that can play low enough that you can keep the mid out of cone breakup. With a good mid, 2.5kHz is plenty low for the tweet. Look at the winning SQ cars on the circuit. VERY few of them run a 3-way front stage and those that do try to cross the mid as low as possible on the low side and as high as possible on the high side. The overall objective is still the same, get one driver to play as much of the frequency spectrum as possible. And ramos's response curve is WAY flatter than yours. You're almost 10dB down above 4kHz. [/QUOTE]

Verification