Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Help
Enclosure Design & Construction
Dissapointed..
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Moble Enclosurs" data-source="post: 7599087" data-attributes="member: 634917"><p>No kidding, lol. Yes, that is the "carrying" I am referring to as well. Again, It is called resonance. And I will say again also, I have calculated it for an optimum .53 cubes, but it does enjoy ported more......not because ported will give it more low end, but because that is just what the drivers mechanical operation will enjoy the most for efficiency.</p><p></p><p>So, if your sealed is larger than .53, try to make it smaller. But I will not revert from the recommendation of going ported still. You will likely not gain the low end you are looking for with a smaller enclosure, but it does give it better excursion control below the mentioned 48Hz LF cutoff of mechanical limitations, so havign it smaller will help in that aspect. But since the low end is mainly "carried" from vehicle resonances, then a ported enclosure will do much more wonders than a sealed for this driver any day.</p><p></p><p>Pretty informative explanation though....I like that. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/biggrin.gif.d71a5d36fcbab170f2364c9f2e3946cb.gif</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Moble Enclosurs, post: 7599087, member: 634917"] No kidding, lol. Yes, that is the "carrying" I am referring to as well. Again, It is called resonance. And I will say again also, I have calculated it for an optimum .53 cubes, but it does enjoy ported more......not because ported will give it more low end, but because that is just what the drivers mechanical operation will enjoy the most for efficiency. So, if your sealed is larger than .53, try to make it smaller. But I will not revert from the recommendation of going ported still. You will likely not gain the low end you are looking for with a smaller enclosure, but it does give it better excursion control below the mentioned 48Hz LF cutoff of mechanical limitations, so havign it smaller will help in that aspect. But since the low end is mainly "carried" from vehicle resonances, then a ported enclosure will do much more wonders than a sealed for this driver any day. Pretty informative explanation though....I like that. [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/biggrin.gif.d71a5d36fcbab170f2364c9f2e3946cb.gif[/IMG] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Help
Enclosure Design & Construction
Dissapointed..
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list