Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Ku-sama" data-source="post: 2790234" data-attributes="member: 574818">but you see, I already have the L7&#039;s on order. I&#039;m putting this cheap *** system in my dad&#039;s &#039;96 S-10.. I&#039;m not keeping anything but the CDTs when I get my MX5... so I was looking for something cheap and the only working speakers in the truck are the rear 4x10s so personally, I don&#039;t think keeping the stock tape deck HU and two shit *** speakers plus a set of sweet *** comps and a good amp would sound better then what I&#039;m doing right now...one more thing on the subject: I actually only paid for about $130 of it.still think it was a bad buy? //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gifdo you think I should bridge the Crunch amp for the subs instead since it has the better RMS power plus it&#039;s newer. then use the KAC-923 for the CTDs and use the 646S bridged and use it with the 4x10s?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Ku-sama, post: 2790234, member: 574818"] but you see, I already have the L7's on order. I'm putting this cheap *** system in my dad's '96 S-10.. I'm not keeping anything but the CDTs when I get my MX5... so I was looking for something cheap and the only working speakers in the truck are the rear 4x10s so personally, I don't think keeping the stock tape deck HU and two shit *** speakers plus a set of sweet *** comps and a good amp would sound better then what I'm doing right now... one more thing on the subject: I actually only paid for about $130 of it. still think it was a bad buy? [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif[/IMG] do you think I should bridge the Crunch amp for the subs instead since it has the better RMS power plus it's newer. then use the KAC-923 for the CTDs and use the 646S bridged and use it with the 4x10s? [/QUOTE]

Verification