Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="OlogyAudio" data-source="post: 1401240" data-attributes="member: 562170">Active and EQ would be the best setup -- though that costs a little more money...&nbsp; What are you looking to spend on the front? (Speakers/amps/EQ) -- you can live without good EQ but... <a href="http://www.partsexpress.com/pdf/295-308g.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.partsexpress.com/pdf/295-308g.pdf</a> look at that FR...&nbsp; The lower you can push the xover point the better with this particular unit...&nbsp; I&#039;d suggest taking a peak at the Seas TDFC or TBFC tweeters<a href="http://www.madisound.com/cgi-bin/index.cgi?cart_id=6475627.29843&amp;amp;pid=1002" target="_blank">http://www.madisound.com/cgi-bin/index.cgi?cart_id=6475627.29843&amp;amp;pid=1002</a><a href="http://www.madisound.com/cgi-bin/index.cgi?cart_id=6475627.29843&amp;amp;pid=1005" target="_blank">http://www.madisound.com/cgi-bin/index.cgi?cart_id=6475627.29843&amp;amp;pid=1005</a>Yea they cost more but it&#039;s very worth it...Comes down to what you can afford rly...I&#039;ve never used this one:<a href="http://www.partsexpress.com/pe/pshowdetl.cfm?&amp;amp;DID=7&amp;amp;Partnumber=290-308&amp;amp;ctab=3#Tabs" target="_blank">http://www.partsexpress.com/pe/pshowdetl.cfm?&amp;amp;DID=7&amp;amp;Partnumber=290-308&amp;amp;ctab=3#Tabs</a>But if you go active it looks like it would be easier than the dayton to get a decently flat response with it...1st order ~1.5khz or so (depending on Q) on the HU and use the amp&#039;s xover between 2-3.5khz depending on the install...This would likely be able to integrate reasonably with the Dayton tweeter...A passive design for ethr of these units wouldn&#039;t be too design friendly...&nbsp; Needless to say a textbook xover in this case would… blow…</blockquote>

[QUOTE="OlogyAudio, post: 1401240, member: 562170"] Active and EQ would be the best setup -- though that costs a little more money... What are you looking to spend on the front? (Speakers/amps/EQ) -- you can live without good EQ but... [URL="http://www.partsexpress.com/pdf/295-308g.pdf"]http://www.partsexpress.com/pdf/295-308g.pdf[/URL] look at that FR... The lower you can push the xover point the better with this particular unit... I'd suggest taking a peak at the Seas TDFC or TBFC tweeters [URL="http://www.madisound.com/cgi-bin/index.cgi?cart_id=6475627.29843&pid=1002"]http://www.madisound.com/cgi-bin/index.cgi?cart_id=6475627.29843&pid=1002[/URL] [URL="http://www.madisound.com/cgi-bin/index.cgi?cart_id=6475627.29843&pid=1005"]http://www.madisound.com/cgi-bin/index.cgi?cart_id=6475627.29843&pid=1005[/URL] Yea they cost more but it's very worth it... Comes down to what you can afford rly... I've never used this one: [URL="http://www.partsexpress.com/pe/pshowdetl.cfm?&DID=7&Partnumber=290-308&ctab=3#Tabs"]http://www.partsexpress.com/pe/pshowdetl.cfm?&DID=7&Partnumber=290-308&ctab=3#Tabs[/URL] But if you go active it looks like it would be easier than the dayton to get a decently flat response with it... 1st order ~1.5khz or so (depending on Q) on the HU and use the amp's xover between 2-3.5khz depending on the install... This would likely be able to integrate reasonably with the Dayton tweeter... A passive design for ethr of these units wouldn't be too design friendly... Needless to say a textbook xover in this case would… blow… [/QUOTE]

Verification