Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
Current events discussion
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RobGMN" data-source="post: 8924620" data-attributes="member: 683408"><p>Bootlickers like deez who'll do anything they can to defend a ****** felon, and justify the fact that they support and voted for a failure.</p><p></p><p>Ask your genius kid to ghost-write your posts for you. They'd do better than this drivel.</p><p></p><p>Vote any new pedos into office lately? Befriend any new rapists or felons? Failed to defend your own wife and kids again?</p><p></p><p>Yet another failed twist. You can't even produce the text of the act, not that you'd even understand it</p><p></p><p>Here's the ironic part: The addition to to an existing act is meant to prevent exactly what you dipsh*ts were whining about with ICE agents: The release of government employees' personal information.</p><p></p><p>So I guess with your hatred of the Nick Shirley act, you are OK with ICE agents being doxed, to include their location at any given moment in time.</p><p>Godd@mn, you right-wingers can't take a step without tripping over your own knuckle-dragging hands.</p><p></p><p><em>"This bill would similarly establish an address confidentiality program for a designated immigration support services provider, employee, or volunteer, as defined, who faces threats of violence or harassment from the public because of their affiliation with a designated immigration support services facility. </em></p><p><em>This bill would additionally prohibit a person, business, or association from soliciting, selling, or trading on the internet the personal information or image of a designated immigration support services provider, employee, or volunteer with the intent described above. </em></p><p><em>The bill would also also, among other things, prohibit a person from posting on the internet, as described above, internet the personal information or image of a designated immigration support services provider, employee, or volunteer, or other individuals residing at the same home address, with the specific intent that another person imminently use that information to commit a crime involving violence or a threat of violence that is imminently likely to occur against such an individual. The bill would define various terms for these purposes. By imposing new duties on local agencies and creating new crimes, this bill would create a state-mandated local program."</em></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RobGMN, post: 8924620, member: 683408"] Bootlickers like deez who'll do anything they can to defend a ****** felon, and justify the fact that they support and voted for a failure. Ask your genius kid to ghost-write your posts for you. They'd do better than this drivel. Vote any new pedos into office lately? Befriend any new rapists or felons? Failed to defend your own wife and kids again? Yet another failed twist. You can't even produce the text of the act, not that you'd even understand it Here's the ironic part: The addition to to an existing act is meant to prevent exactly what you dipsh*ts were whining about with ICE agents: The release of government employees' personal information. So I guess with your hatred of the Nick Shirley act, you are OK with ICE agents being doxed, to include their location at any given moment in time. Godd@mn, you right-wingers can't take a step without tripping over your own knuckle-dragging hands. [I]"This bill would similarly establish an address confidentiality program for a designated immigration support services provider, employee, or volunteer, as defined, who faces threats of violence or harassment from the public because of their affiliation with a designated immigration support services facility. This bill would additionally prohibit a person, business, or association from soliciting, selling, or trading on the internet the personal information or image of a designated immigration support services provider, employee, or volunteer with the intent described above. The bill would also also, among other things, prohibit a person from posting on the internet, as described above, internet the personal information or image of a designated immigration support services provider, employee, or volunteer, or other individuals residing at the same home address, with the specific intent that another person imminently use that information to commit a crime involving violence or a threat of violence that is imminently likely to occur against such an individual. The bill would define various terms for these purposes. By imposing new duties on local agencies and creating new crimes, this bill would create a state-mandated local program."[/I] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
Current events discussion
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list
