Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="RobGMN" data-source="post: 8918801" data-attributes="member: 683408">Yep. The deep state managed to instantly fake all the videos and pictures taken at the scene.The 9mm cellphone:[ATTACH=full]70182[/ATTACH].The offcier shoved him and a woman. She was standing still, he was retreating. Then, the officer maced him.Then when 6 officers had him pinned, one chose to shoot him. Five times. When he hadn&#039;t drawn his weapon, based on video from multiple vantage points.Fearing for &quot;his&quot; life, but not the lives of anyone else there? Why?Magazines: Two is one. One is none. Holsters regularly have storage for an additional magazine.This is not something new. It&#039;s common.Also common: The Trump goons having guns that are tacticool, but useless. Sorry mall ninjas, an infrared scope on a high-rise mount is utterly useless without an IR vision system.Gimme a head count on how many of the goons have IR vision systems on.He was taking video of the situation, and backed off when approached by an officer.Tough guy? Hardly.And would you look at that. An officer had already taken his gun and was walking away with it BEFORE he was shot five times and died.[ATTACH=full]70184[/ATTACH]Let me know when they outlaw people taking videos of public things happening in public places. I&#039;ll show you lawmakers who are trying to hide something.So tell me, why did the officers start snatching up cellphones after the shooting?Under what legal authority were they doing so?And the key question: WHY were they doing so? What did they want to make sure no one sees? Perhaps the fact that they shot an unarmed US citizen.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="RobGMN, post: 8918801, member: 683408"] Yep. The deep state managed to instantly fake all the videos and pictures taken at the scene. The 9mm cellphone: [ATTACH type="full" width="405px" alt="1769316959638.png"]70182[/ATTACH] .The offcier shoved him and a woman. She was standing still, he was retreating. Then, the officer maced him. Then when 6 officers had him pinned, one chose to shoot him. Five times. When he hadn't drawn his weapon, based on video from multiple vantage points. Fearing for "his" life, but not the lives of anyone else there? Why? Magazines: Two is one. One is none. Holsters regularly have storage for an additional magazine. This is not something new. It's common. Also common: The Trump goons having guns that are tacticool, but useless. Sorry mall ninjas, an infrared scope on a high-rise mount is utterly useless without an IR vision system. Gimme a head count on how many of the goons have IR vision systems on. He was taking video of the situation, and backed off when approached by an officer. Tough guy? Hardly. And would you look at that. An officer had already taken his gun and was walking away with it BEFORE he was shot five times and died. [ATTACH type="full"]70184[/ATTACH] Let me know when they outlaw people taking videos of public things happening in public places. I'll show you lawmakers who are trying to hide something. So tell me, why did the officers start snatching up cellphones after the shooting? Under what legal authority were they doing so? And the key question: WHY were they doing so? What did they want to make sure no one sees? Perhaps the fact that they shot an unarmed US citizen. [/QUOTE]

Verification