Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
Current events discussion
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RobGMN" data-source="post: 8916213" data-attributes="member: 683408"><p>I spend my time investigating, stopping, preventing, and prosecuting when possible.</p><p></p><p>Here's the thing about fraud: If states spent the money it would take to prevent it on the front end, people would be bitching about the expense. You'd be talking about a minimum of quadrupling the welfare workforce, so that workers could do deep-dives on every case and every application they worked on. </p><p></p><p>In some states. workers have as many as 1500 cases they are responsible for. Some are touched annually, some are touched every six months, some are touched monthly. How much time do you think a worker can spend on each of those 1,500 cases in a 2,000 hour work year?</p><p>It's actually financially far cheaper to catch it on the back end than it is to employ the number of people needed to prevent it on the front end.</p><p></p><p>Did you ever notice that if you need a cop, one is only 15 minutes away? Wouldn't crime prevention be better if every city had a cop on every corner 24/7, ready to act?</p><p>Sure. But think of the cost.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RobGMN, post: 8916213, member: 683408"] I spend my time investigating, stopping, preventing, and prosecuting when possible. Here's the thing about fraud: If states spent the money it would take to prevent it on the front end, people would be bitching about the expense. You'd be talking about a minimum of quadrupling the welfare workforce, so that workers could do deep-dives on every case and every application they worked on. In some states. workers have as many as 1500 cases they are responsible for. Some are touched annually, some are touched every six months, some are touched monthly. How much time do you think a worker can spend on each of those 1,500 cases in a 2,000 hour work year? It's actually financially far cheaper to catch it on the back end than it is to employ the number of people needed to prevent it on the front end. Did you ever notice that if you need a cop, one is only 15 minutes away? Wouldn't crime prevention be better if every city had a cop on every corner 24/7, ready to act? Sure. But think of the cost. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
Current events discussion
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list