Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
Current events discussion
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RobGMN" data-source="post: 8914817" data-attributes="member: 683408"><p>Not that laws or court decisions seem to matter to some people here (and some people in our government, apparently), this one flies in the face of an argument I have seen here multiple times.</p><p></p><p><em>"Such repeated conjoined use by high-ranking officials of thewords “criminal” and “alien” prompts the need for clarification of two fundamental facts inreviewing the two pending motions brought by individual immigrants and an immigrant-focusedorganization in this case. First, “<u>[a]s a general rule, it is not a crime for a removable alien to remain present in the United States</u>.” Arizona v. United States, 567 U.S. 387, 407 (2012)(citing INS v. Lopez-Mendoza, 468 U.S. 1032, 1038 (1984))."</em></p><p><em>[URL unfurl="true"]https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.285268/gov.uscourts.dcd.285268.68.0.pdf[/URL]</em></p><p><em>[URL unfurl="true"]https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/567/387/[/URL]</em></p><p></p><p>We may WANT it to be a crime, but the law doesn't give a crap about what we WANT. It only matters what the law IS (until some dirty judge decides against the actual rule of law).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RobGMN, post: 8914817, member: 683408"] Not that laws or court decisions seem to matter to some people here (and some people in our government, apparently), this one flies in the face of an argument I have seen here multiple times. [I]"Such repeated conjoined use by high-ranking officials of thewords “criminal” and “alien” prompts the need for clarification of two fundamental facts inreviewing the two pending motions brought by individual immigrants and an immigrant-focusedorganization in this case. First, “[U][a]s a general rule, it is not a crime for a removable alien to remain present in the United States[/U].” Arizona v. United States, 567 U.S. 387, 407 (2012)(citing INS v. Lopez-Mendoza, 468 U.S. 1032, 1038 (1984))." [URL unfurl="true"]https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.285268/gov.uscourts.dcd.285268.68.0.pdf[/URL] [URL unfurl="true"]https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/567/387/[/URL][/I] We may WANT it to be a crime, but the law doesn't give a crap about what we WANT. It only matters what the law IS (until some dirty judge decides against the actual rule of law). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
Current events discussion
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list