Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="RobGMN" data-source="post: 8914123" data-attributes="member: 683408">Oh? I&#039;ll bet you a grand that I&#039;ve given the links to the hearing decision at least a half-dozen times.Do you believe your own words enough to risk it?A dig? More like a statement of fact. That it could be considered a &quot;dig&quot; is just a bonus. You&#039;ve brought it up a bunch times, as if it has any bearing on things. It&#039;s obviously close to the front of your mind.Like all of your other &quot;proofs&quot;, you have not provided this proof.I&#039;ll ask you to do so now.A nickel says you will claim you already did (using a lot more text than it would take to give the proof), and then move on.Or maybe you&#039;ll be brief and just say &quot;I gave you the number&quot;?Not that facts matter much around here, but she wrote: “The point of the theft, I assume, was to be able to peddle grotesque lies by distorting my stream-of-consciousness thoughts,” “After being the victim of a crime in my early twenties, I developed PTSD,” “The journal that was stolen was part of my efforts to heal. I am a private citizen, targeted only because my father happened to be running to be President. In other words, the extensive work I have done to move past my trauma was undone by Ms. Harris’s actions.”“The defendant’s actions have created a constant environment of anxiety, fear, and intimidation in which my innermost thoughts are constantly distorted and manipulated.”OK. Now show us the proofs of your claims.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="RobGMN, post: 8914123, member: 683408"] Oh? I'll bet you a grand that I've given the links to the hearing decision at least a half-dozen times. Do you believe your own words enough to risk it? A dig? More like a statement of fact. That it could be considered a "dig" is just a bonus. You've brought it up a bunch times, as if it has any bearing on things. It's obviously close to the front of your mind. Like all of your other "proofs", you have not provided this proof. I'll ask you to do so now. A nickel says you will claim you already did (using a lot more text than it would take to give the proof), and then move on. Or maybe you'll be brief and just say "[I]I gave you the number"[/I]? Not that facts matter much around here, but she wrote: [I]“The point of the theft, I assume, was to be able to peddle grotesque lies by distorting my stream-of-consciousness thoughts,” “After being the victim of a crime in my early twenties, I developed PTSD,” “The journal that was stolen was part of my efforts to heal. I am a private citizen, targeted only because my father happened to be running to be President. In other words, the extensive work I have done to move past my trauma was undone by Ms. Harris’s actions.” “The defendant’s actions have created a constant environment of anxiety, fear, and intimidation in which my innermost thoughts are constantly distorted and manipulated.”[/I] OK. Now show us the proofs of your claims. [/QUOTE]

Verification