Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="RobGMN" data-source="post: 8913582" data-attributes="member: 683408">OK. So then you are saying that the Democrat states on that list were actually Republican, pre-flip.The Democrat states slightly outnumber the Republican states (as named) on that list.So, there were actually more Republican states (using the name Democrat at the time) on the list who were mandating segregation.You toasted Jimi&#039;s argument that the Dems were the &quot;bad guys&quot;. It was actually more Republican states that were racist.Which &quot;the school system&quot; is removing History class? I couldn&#039;t have been less interested in History class in grade-school/High School. None of my teachers did a damn thing to make it interesting, or something I WANTED to even grasp.I already did. See the list of states that were mandated-segregation.See the definition of &quot;values&quot; that I posted.But you said the Republicans of yore are the Democrats of now.Regardless, we&#039;re talking about the 1950&#039;s, not 100 years prior.To use racism as an argument, then it must exist.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="RobGMN, post: 8913582, member: 683408"] OK. So then you are saying that the Democrat states on that list were actually Republican, pre-flip. The Democrat states slightly outnumber the Republican states (as named) on that list. So, there were actually more Republican states (using the name Democrat at the time) on the list who were mandating segregation. You toasted Jimi's argument that the Dems were the "bad guys". It was actually more Republican states that were racist. Which "the school system" is removing History class? I couldn't have been less interested in History class in grade-school/High School. None of my teachers did a damn thing to make it interesting, or something I WANTED to even grasp. I already did. See the list of states that were mandated-segregation. See the definition of "values" that I posted. But you said the Republicans of yore are the Democrats of now. Regardless, we're talking about the 1950's, not 100 years prior. To use racism as an argument, then it must exist. [/QUOTE]

Verification