Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
Current events discussion
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jimi77" data-source="post: 8913053" data-attributes="member: 673702"><p>I must admit I'm surprised that Rob didn't amend his position on the subject. I just assumed when he asked for proof of these books in the school, that meant the reason he wasn't opposed to these books in schools is because he didn't think they were there in the first. Now that proof of these books in schools has been provided and Rob hasn't amended his position, one has to wonder why he wants these books in schools. I'm sure there must be a perfectly logical reason. </p><p></p><p>I can remotely lock that ish off my kid's electronics.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jimi77, post: 8913053, member: 673702"] I must admit I'm surprised that Rob didn't amend his position on the subject. I just assumed when he asked for proof of these books in the school, that meant the reason he wasn't opposed to these books in schools is because he didn't think they were there in the first. Now that proof of these books in schools has been provided and Rob hasn't amended his position, one has to wonder why he wants these books in schools. I'm sure there must be a perfectly logical reason. I can remotely lock that ish off my kid's electronics. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
Current events discussion
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list
