Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="RobGMN" data-source="post: 8912200" data-attributes="member: 683408">So you fail to read the law, and fail to read the court documents. or maybe you simply can&#039;t understand them.And you think that somehow equates to Trump being innocent?Phuq, that&#039;s pretty damn funny.Expain the stupidity you are trying to push with this statement.A pro-Trump group, claiming that the judge was unfair, after the jury decided on his guilt?WOW, that is so thoroughly convincing, I have to rethink EVERYTHING.Nope. It&#039;s no more convincing than any of your dumb parroting of other idiots you hear or watch.This is a circular argument. It says their acts were unconstitutional, becasue their acts were unconstitutional.OK. Then Trump was judged guilty, becasue Trump is guilty.Appeal denied.&quot;ambiguous, unknown federal crime&quot;.Election tampering and tax evasion are as far from &quot;ambiguous&quot; and &quot;unknown&quot; as can be.Tax evasion is covered under 26 U.S.C. § 7201: Any <a href="https://www.law.cornell.edu/definitions/uscode.php?width=840&amp;height=800&amp;iframe=true&amp;def_id=26-USC-991716523-1978202097&amp;term_occur=999&amp;term_src=title:26:subtitle:F:chapter:75:subchapter:A:part:I:section:7201" target="_blank">person</a> who willfully attempts in any manner to evade or defeat any tax imposed by this title or the payment thereof shall, in addition to other penalties provided by law, be guilty of a felony and, upon conviction thereof, shall be fined not more than $100,000 ($500,000 in the case of a corporation), or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both, together with the costs of prosecution.(Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736No, tax evasion law wasn&#039;t &quot;made up by Democrats to hurt Trump&quot;. It goes back to the Civil War.Election tampering is covered under 52 U.S. Code § 20511. Go ahead and look them both up, then come back with your scholarly analysis of how they are &quot;ambiguous&quot; and &quot;unknown&quot; laws.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="RobGMN, post: 8912200, member: 683408"] So you fail to read the law, and fail to read the court documents. or maybe you simply can't understand them. And you think that somehow equates to Trump being innocent? Phuq, that's pretty damn funny. Expain the stupidity you are trying to push with this statement. A pro-Trump group, claiming that the judge was unfair, after the jury decided on his guilt? WOW, that is so thoroughly convincing, I have to rethink EVERYTHING. Nope. It's no more convincing than any of your dumb parroting of other idiots you hear or watch. This is a circular argument. It says their acts were unconstitutional, becasue their acts were unconstitutional. OK. Then Trump was judged guilty, becasue Trump is guilty. Appeal denied. "ambiguous, unknown federal crime". Election tampering and tax evasion are as far from "ambiguous" and "unknown" as can be. Tax evasion is covered under 26 U.S.C. § 7201: Any [URL='https://www.law.cornell.edu/definitions/uscode.php?width=840&height=800&iframe=true&def_id=26-USC-991716523-1978202097&term_occur=999&term_src=title:26:subtitle:F:chapter:75:subchapter:A:part:I:section:7201']person[/URL] who willfully attempts in any manner to evade or defeat any tax imposed by this title or the payment thereof shall, in addition to other penalties provided by law, be guilty of a felony and, upon conviction thereof, shall be fined not more than $100,000 ($500,000 in the case of a corporation), or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both, together with the costs of prosecution. (Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736 No, tax evasion law wasn't "made up by Democrats to hurt Trump". It goes back to the Civil War. Election tampering is covered under 52 U.S. Code § 20511. Go ahead and look them both up, then come back with your scholarly analysis of how they are "ambiguous" and "unknown" laws. [/QUOTE]

Verification