Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="RobGMN" data-source="post: 8910076" data-attributes="member: 683408">WHO said he was &quot;doing it for the Republicans&quot;? Not me, not anyone else in this thread.If you want to &quot;keep context&quot;, then don&#039;t add a context that didn&#039;t exist prior.Nuances in words are important if you want to &quot;keep context&quot;.No one said that Republicans encouraged him to do it. Someone here has said even though he specifically targeted Democrats and claims he was order to hit these people to further Tim Walz&#039;s career, there is no reason to consider his actions political. That&#039;s an utterly ridiculous stance to take, even if you don&#039;t care to admit it.I do find it hilarious that you think it&#039;s a &quot;mind game&quot; that I comment on your tl;dr post by referencing the sheer volume of nonsense you claim to have read about sheer nonsense.Thanks for the chuckle.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="RobGMN, post: 8910076, member: 683408"] WHO said he was "doing it for the Republicans"? Not me, not anyone else in this thread. If you want to "keep context", then don't add a context that didn't exist prior. Nuances in words are important if you want to "keep context". No one said that Republicans encouraged him to do it. Someone here has said even though he specifically targeted Democrats and claims he was order to hit these people to further Tim Walz's career, there is no reason to consider his actions political. That's an utterly ridiculous stance to take, even if you don't care to admit it. I do find it hilarious that you think it's a "mind game" that I comment on your tl;dr post by referencing the sheer volume of nonsense you claim to have read about sheer nonsense. Thanks for the chuckle. [/QUOTE]

Verification