Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="RobGMN" data-source="post: 8907123" data-attributes="member: 683408">Republicans. The party of calm and reason.[URL unfurl=&quot;true&quot;]https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Aggression-and-party-affiliation-Republicans-were-significantly-more-aggressive-than_fig2_221980088[/URL][ATTACH=full]67848[/ATTACH]Context 1... Figure 3 shows that aggression was higher among self-declared Republicans ( N 19, mean 0 4.32) than Democrats ( N 0 54, mean 0 3.33) or Independents ( N 0 33, mean 0 3.94). The difference between Republicans and Democrats was significant (Mann- Whitney U -test: Z 0 3.18, N =54,19, p &lt;0.001) but the difference between Republicans and Independents was not (Mann-Whitney U -test: Z 0 1.42, N =33,19, p 0 0.16). This reflects the fact that it is not simply that Republicans are more aggressive than all other people in the sample. Rather, Republicans are somewhat more aggressive than average, while Democrats are somewhat less aggressive than average (the difference between Democrats and Independents was significant in the other direction — Mann-Whitney U test: Z 0 2.32, N =54,33, p 0 0.020). Within individual scenarios, Republicans were more aggressive than Democrats in all cases (Fig. 4). This was not far from significance in the Hostage crisis (Mann- Whitney U -test: Z 0 1.67, N =55,19, p 0 0.095), highly significant in the Central Asian crisis ( Z 3.61, N =55,19, p &lt;0.001), and not significant in the Latin American crisis ( Z 0 0.77, N =54,19, p 0 ...</blockquote>

[QUOTE="RobGMN, post: 8907123, member: 683408"] Republicans. The party of calm and reason. [URL unfurl="true"]https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Aggression-and-party-affiliation-Republicans-were-significantly-more-aggressive-than_fig2_221980088[/URL] [ATTACH type="full" width="465px"]67848[/ATTACH] [B]Context 1[/B] ... Figure 3 shows that [B]aggression was higher among self-declared Republicans ( N 19, mean 0 4.32) than Democrats[/B] ( N 0 54, mean 0 3.33) or Independents ( N 0 33, mean 0 3.94).[B] The difference between Republicans and Democrats was significant[/B] (Mann- Whitney U -test: Z 0 3.18, N =54,19, p <0.001) but the difference between Republicans and Independents was not (Mann-Whitney U -test: Z 0 1.42, N =33,19, p 0 0.16). This reflects the fact that it is not simply that Republicans are more aggressive than all other people in the sample. Rather, Republicans are somewhat more aggressive than average, while Democrats are somewhat less aggressive than average (the difference between Democrats and Independents was significant in the other direction — Mann-Whitney U test: Z 0 2.32, N =54,33, p 0 0.020). Within individual scenarios, Republicans were more aggressive than Democrats in all cases (Fig. 4). This was not far from significance in the Hostage crisis (Mann- Whitney U -test: Z 0 1.67, N =55,19, p 0 0.095), highly significant in the Central Asian crisis ( Z 3.61, N =55,19, p <0.001), and not significant in the Latin American crisis ( Z 0 0.77, N =54,19, p 0 ... [/QUOTE]

Verification