Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
Current events discussion
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Buck" data-source="post: 8905985" data-attributes="member: 591582"><p>"These establish the fact that the types of “anti-gravity”, propellantless propulsion, and mass reduction technologies described in the Navy’s recent “UFO” patents are at least based on more than 60 years of peer-reviewed research conducted and published by the likes of the American Institute of Physics, NASA, the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, and the Air Force Research Laboratory."</p><p></p><p>[URL unfurl="true"]https://www.twz.com/30499/the-truth-is-the-military-has-been-researching-anti-gravity-for-nearly-70-years[/URL]</p><p></p><p>"Behind the project rests many years of, initially, Russian research, and later on American research at NASA and now Boeing - to investigate 'propellentless propulsion' the politically correct term for anti-gravity machines. Much of the western research has been aimed at testing the validity of Podkletnov's fundamental work with several projects over the years at NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center."</p><p></p><p>[URL unfurl="true"]https://www.spacedaily.com/news/rocketscience-02t.html[/URL]</p><p></p><p>"While at NASA, Charles Buhler helped establish the <a href="https://www.nasa.gov/exploration-research-and-technology/electrostatics-and-surface-physics-laboratory/" target="_blank">Electrostatics and Surface Physics</a> Laboratory at Kennedy Space Center in Florida—a <em>very</em> important lab that basically ensures rockets don’t explode. Now, as co-founder of the <a href="https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/a60259881/casimir-effect-explained/" target="_blank">space</a> company Exodus Propulsion Technologies, Buhler told the website <em><a href="https://thedebrief.org/nasa-veterans-propellantless-propulsion-drive-that-physics-says-shouldnt-work-just-produced-enough-thrust-to-defeat-earths-gravity/" target="_blank">The Debrief</a> </em>that they’ve created a drive powered by a “New Force” outside our current known laws of physics, giving the propellant-less drive enough boost to overcome gravity."</p><p></p><p>[URL unfurl="true"]https://www.popularmechanics.com/space/rockets/a65924333/engineer-overcoming-earths-gravity/[/URL]</p><p></p><p>"Electrogravitics and electrokinetics can be traced to T. Townsend Brown’s first article “How I Control Gravity” (Science and Invention, 1929) with the unexplained alignment of the “molecular gravitors”. <strong><em>Brown reported that the dielectrics had high propulsive force when the “differently charged elements” were aligned with the voltage source. </em></strong>Perhaps electrogravitics was also revealed in the article <strong>“Gravity Nullified: Quartz Crystals Charged by High Frequency Currents Lose Their Weight”</strong> which appeared two years earlier in the same magazine in <strong>September of 1927.</strong> The editors had a change of heart however, in the following issue, they rescinded the article."</p><p></p><p>[URL unfurl="true"]https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation?paperid=55806[/URL]</p><p></p><p>You don't even know what you don't even know. TT Brown did military work.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Buck, post: 8905985, member: 591582"] "These establish the fact that the types of “anti-gravity”, propellantless propulsion, and mass reduction technologies described in the Navy’s recent “UFO” patents are at least based on more than 60 years of peer-reviewed research conducted and published by the likes of the American Institute of Physics, NASA, the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, and the Air Force Research Laboratory." [URL unfurl="true"]https://www.twz.com/30499/the-truth-is-the-military-has-been-researching-anti-gravity-for-nearly-70-years[/URL] "Behind the project rests many years of, initially, Russian research, and later on American research at NASA and now Boeing - to investigate 'propellentless propulsion' the politically correct term for anti-gravity machines. Much of the western research has been aimed at testing the validity of Podkletnov's fundamental work with several projects over the years at NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center." [URL unfurl="true"]https://www.spacedaily.com/news/rocketscience-02t.html[/URL] "While at NASA, Charles Buhler helped establish the [URL='https://www.nasa.gov/exploration-research-and-technology/electrostatics-and-surface-physics-laboratory/']Electrostatics and Surface Physics[/URL] Laboratory at Kennedy Space Center in Florida—a [I]very[/I] important lab that basically ensures rockets don’t explode. Now, as co-founder of the [URL='https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/a60259881/casimir-effect-explained/']space[/URL] company Exodus Propulsion Technologies, Buhler told the website [I][URL='https://thedebrief.org/nasa-veterans-propellantless-propulsion-drive-that-physics-says-shouldnt-work-just-produced-enough-thrust-to-defeat-earths-gravity/']The Debrief[/URL] [/I]that they’ve created a drive powered by a “New Force” outside our current known laws of physics, giving the propellant-less drive enough boost to overcome gravity." [URL unfurl="true"]https://www.popularmechanics.com/space/rockets/a65924333/engineer-overcoming-earths-gravity/[/URL] "Electrogravitics and electrokinetics can be traced to T. Townsend Brown’s first article “How I Control Gravity” (Science and Invention, 1929) with the unexplained alignment of the “molecular gravitors”. [B][I]Brown reported that the dielectrics had high propulsive force when the “differently charged elements” were aligned with the voltage source. [/I][/B]Perhaps electrogravitics was also revealed in the article [B]“Gravity Nullified: Quartz Crystals Charged by High Frequency Currents Lose Their Weight”[/B] which appeared two years earlier in the same magazine in [B]September of 1927.[/B] The editors had a change of heart however, in the following issue, they rescinded the article." [URL unfurl="true"]https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation?paperid=55806[/URL] You don't even know what you don't even know. TT Brown did military work. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
Current events discussion
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list
