Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="RobGMN" data-source="post: 8905053" data-attributes="member: 683408">mmm hmmm. Still waiting for your &quot;professional driver&quot; certification. Did you lose it while living at everyone else&#039;s houses over the years?In the meantime, I shared cases here that I prosecuted. i have shared info about my business. I have shared my contact info (which that pansy &quot;Jesus&quot; gave to a real estate broker, then he suddenly vanished form the forum when I started skip-tracing him&quot;.Interesting how reality works, versus your little fantasy world, huh?Even Jimi stopped reading your stuff becasue it&#039;s &quot;mind numbing&quot;.Speaking of &quot;understands&quot;, have you figured out the cause of death on Floyd&#039;s autopsy yet, or do you still think it&#039;s &quot;gibberish&quot;?I see you&#039;ve failed to show us where the acronym &quot;COD&quot; appears on the autopsy, or the word &quot;cause&quot;, or the phrase &quot;cause of death&quot;. Were you unable to find it, after you claimed it was on there?Did you forget to check the facts before making the claim?The one released by the Hennepin County ME&#039;s office, written by Dr. Andrew Baker?Yes, I did. I guss you forgot to do so before you claimed something was in there, that is not.No, it means the continued subdual only made the medical situation (caused by the subdual) worse.Like when you choke somebody into unconsciousness, but maintain the choke hold after they pass out.It DOESN&#039;T mean that his medical issues made it complicated to subdue him.Do you need me to use simpler words, like &quot;unknown&quot;, or &quot;secret&quot;? Maybe &quot;disguised&quot; or &quot;hidden&quot;? How about &quot;nameless&quot; or &quot;unnamed&quot;? I&#039;m sure &quot;incognito&quot; would cause you to melt down.Or do you need me to cycle through all of them, so you can keep your focus without drifting off like you saw a squirrel outside the window?&#039;Seems the one projecting is you, kid. How many times have you made the claim that I just settled into a job ANYONE could have, and make no effort to get ahead (despite earning promotions on an average of every 4 years), when it is actually YOU that you are describing (except for the part about actually having a job for longer than a few months, of course)?Isn&#039;t it funny how every job you had briefly and failed at, it was the &quot;bosses&quot; that were screwed up, and not you?And here you are at 51 years old, jobless yet again, and living in your parent&#039;s home.My esteem is good, because I put effort into life, and I reap the benefits of my efforts.There&#039;s THAT claim again. And there&#039;s you, unable to substantiate the claim again.Should I even ASK you to, or will you just tapdance off onto another subject when challenged? it sure seems to be your M.O. here.Speaking of lying, tell us more about that cool gun collection you don&#039;t own.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="RobGMN, post: 8905053, member: 683408"] mmm hmmm. Still waiting for your "professional driver" certification. Did you lose it while living at everyone else's houses over the years? In the meantime, I shared cases here that I prosecuted. i have shared info about my business. I have shared my contact info (which that pansy "Jesus" gave to a real estate broker, then he suddenly vanished form the forum when I started skip-tracing him". Interesting how reality works, versus your little fantasy world, huh? Even Jimi stopped reading your stuff becasue it's "mind numbing". Speaking of "understands", have you figured out the cause of death on Floyd's autopsy yet, or do you still think it's "gibberish"? I see you've failed to show us where the acronym "COD" appears on the autopsy, or the word "cause", or the phrase "cause of death". Were you unable to find it, after you claimed it was on there? Did you forget to check the facts before making the claim? The one released by the Hennepin County ME's office, written by Dr. Andrew Baker? Yes, I did. I guss you forgot to do so before you claimed something was in there, that is not. No, it means the continued subdual only made the medical situation (caused by the subdual) worse. Like when you choke somebody into unconsciousness, but maintain the choke hold after they pass out. It DOESN'T mean that his medical issues made it complicated to subdue him. Do you need me to use simpler words, like "unknown", or "secret"? Maybe "disguised" or "hidden"? How about "nameless" or "unnamed"? I'm sure "incognito" would cause you to melt down. Or do you need me to cycle through all of them, so you can keep your focus without drifting off like you saw a squirrel outside the window? 'Seems the one projecting is you, kid. How many times have you made the claim that I just settled into a job ANYONE could have, and make no effort to get ahead (despite earning promotions on an average of every 4 years), when it is actually YOU that you are describing (except for the part about actually having a job for longer than a few months, of course)? Isn't it funny how every job you had briefly and failed at, it was the "bosses" that were screwed up, and not you? And here you are at 51 years old, jobless yet again, and living in your parent's home. My esteem is good, because I put effort into life, and I reap the benefits of my efforts. There's THAT claim again. And there's you, unable to substantiate the claim again. Should I even ASK you to, or will you just tapdance off onto another subject when challenged? it sure seems to be your M.O. here. Speaking of lying, tell us more about that cool gun collection you don't own. [/QUOTE]

Verification