Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Jimi77" data-source="post: 8900925" data-attributes="member: 673702">Even then, I&#039;m 99% sure he said they might have shrank.&nbsp; And how does OJ&#039;s blood get on the glove?&nbsp; OJ had that nick on his hand, but if that&#039;s where the blood came from, then they&#039;re asking a jury to believe he attacked Nicole and Goldman and at some point the glove comes off, OJ nicks his hand, OJ finishes killing Nicole &amp; Goldman, the proceeds to locate one glove (but leaves the hat and other glove), takes the glove home and for some reason disposes of it in the Kato trash can and then proceeds to &quot;properly&quot; disappear the remaining evidence (except the socks).&nbsp; Or... there is reason LAPD can&#039;t account for all the blood they drew from OJ.&nbsp; I&#039;m not saying senario #1 didn&#039;t happen, but given LAPD&#039;s reputation (at the time) for planting evidence on black men, which is the more likely scenario?&nbsp; Doesn&#039;t this alone cast doubt on LAPD&#039;s version of events?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Jimi77, post: 8900925, member: 673702"] Even then, I'm 99% sure he said they might have shrank. And how does OJ's blood get on the glove? OJ had that nick on his hand, but if that's where the blood came from, then they're asking a jury to believe he attacked Nicole and Goldman and at some point the glove comes off, OJ nicks his hand, OJ finishes killing Nicole & Goldman, the proceeds to locate one glove (but leaves the hat and other glove), takes the glove home and for some reason disposes of it in the Kato trash can and then proceeds to "properly" disappear the remaining evidence (except the socks). Or... there is reason LAPD can't account for all the blood they drew from OJ. I'm not saying senario #1 didn't happen, but given LAPD's reputation (at the time) for planting evidence on black men, which is the more likely scenario? Doesn't this alone cast doubt on LAPD's version of events? [/QUOTE]

Verification