Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
Current events discussion
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RobGMN" data-source="post: 8889990" data-attributes="member: 683408"><p>HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.</p><p>If the US military couldn't fly a helicopter higher than 200ft, they'd never be able to get anywhere. FAA rules require 1,000 foot altitude over urban areas, and 500 feet over rural except to take off or land.</p><p>Military aircraft are not exempt from FAA rules.</p><p>It's FAR Part 91.119</p><p></p><p>Stop ******* his ***, trying to defend him. He's not going to see you posts here and invite you to MaraLago to be a part of his inner circle.</p><p></p><p>If you post it here, you are "saying" it. If you want to claim that you lie, and thus quotes of your post are a lie, fine.</p><p></p><p>Of for **** sake, I'll explain it since you are to dim to understand. You said "the appeal will be a no brainer" with the obvious presumption that he will win. I said "like the appeals in the **** case?" which everyone on the right assumed he would win.</p><p>Get it? NOT that difficult to see the logical connection. JFC.</p><p></p><p>Dozens upon dozens of your posts prove otherwise.</p><p></p><p>Oh? Yet your big push is to cease US involvement in preventing Communism from absorbing every other country (a goal of Communism). If you're not against it, you desire it.</p><p></p><p>Go search "suuck diick" or minor variations in your post history. You failingly use it as an attempted insult. And don't try to bullshit us that "it's a complement". Except for you, no one here is stupid enough to believe that crap.</p><p></p><p>Oh? OK, swear to it here that you never defended **** by saying "because women lie".</p><p></p><p>So you never said that if Trump said something, it's true? Swear to that?</p><p></p><p>In your mind, because the English language is difficult and confusing to you. Years later, you're still trying to figure out irony. Did anyone clue you in on "in your wheelhouse" yet?</p><p></p><p>Dozens of your posts prove otherwise.</p><p></p><p>THIS is ironic. You accuse me of lying, but have YET to provide any evidence of this "lying". That would make YOU the liar.</p><p>The accuser being the guilty one = IRONY</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RobGMN, post: 8889990, member: 683408"] HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. If the US military couldn't fly a helicopter higher than 200ft, they'd never be able to get anywhere. FAA rules require 1,000 foot altitude over urban areas, and 500 feet over rural except to take off or land. Military aircraft are not exempt from FAA rules. It's FAR Part 91.119 Stop ******* his ***, trying to defend him. He's not going to see you posts here and invite you to MaraLago to be a part of his inner circle. If you post it here, you are "saying" it. If you want to claim that you lie, and thus quotes of your post are a lie, fine. Of for **** sake, I'll explain it since you are to dim to understand. You said "the appeal will be a no brainer" with the obvious presumption that he will win. I said "like the appeals in the **** case?" which everyone on the right assumed he would win. Get it? NOT that difficult to see the logical connection. JFC. Dozens upon dozens of your posts prove otherwise. Oh? Yet your big push is to cease US involvement in preventing Communism from absorbing every other country (a goal of Communism). If you're not against it, you desire it. Go search "suuck diick" or minor variations in your post history. You failingly use it as an attempted insult. And don't try to bullshit us that "it's a complement". Except for you, no one here is stupid enough to believe that crap. Oh? OK, swear to it here that you never defended **** by saying "because women lie". So you never said that if Trump said something, it's true? Swear to that? In your mind, because the English language is difficult and confusing to you. Years later, you're still trying to figure out irony. Did anyone clue you in on "in your wheelhouse" yet? Dozens of your posts prove otherwise. THIS is ironic. You accuse me of lying, but have YET to provide any evidence of this "lying". That would make YOU the liar. The accuser being the guilty one = IRONY [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
Current events discussion
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list