Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="RobGMN" data-source="post: 8889627" data-attributes="member: 683408">So prove to us all that you aren&#039;t on this forum to promulgate Trump&#039;s and your own lies, then defend them as truths when they are called out.Arnold. The one who caused 700% more acreage to burn in wildfires when he became governor?Interesting. Pointing out lies someone says is now defending another person?Quite the flip-flop there.Ahhhhh, so you assume what is taught in the AirForce is not a furtherance of what they might have learned before. Based on your time in the AirForce?Ohhhh, so you respond to specifics with a generality. OK. In that case, Republican have a worse track record on wildfires than Democrats.Considering you don&#039;t even believe Trump spoke words in his own press conferences, there is obviously no source you&#039;ll believe, except the one in your own head.Like the source that tells you &quot;in&quot; means &quot;passing through but not attached&quot;.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="RobGMN, post: 8889627, member: 683408"] So prove to us all that you aren't on this forum to promulgate Trump's and your own lies, then defend them as truths when they are called out. Arnold. The one who caused 700% more acreage to burn in wildfires when he became governor? Interesting. Pointing out lies someone says is now defending another person? Quite the flip-flop there. Ahhhhh, so you assume what is taught in the AirForce is not a furtherance of what they might have learned before. Based on your time in the AirForce? Ohhhh, so you respond to specifics with a generality. OK. In that case, Republican have a worse track record on wildfires than Democrats. Considering you don't even believe Trump spoke words in his own press conferences, there is obviously no source you'll believe, except the one in your own head. Like the source that tells you "in" means "passing through but not attached". [/QUOTE]

Verification